Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 290 XFX Double Dissipation Edition GeForce GTX 460 SLI
Cyberpunk 2077 23% 113%
Hitman 3 60% 177%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 12% 95%
Resident Evil 8 23% 113%
FIFA 21 38% 8%
Grand Theft Auto VI 73% 200%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 9% 89%
Genshin Impact 23% 113%
The Medium 53% 166%
Far Cry 6 78% 208%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 290 XFX Double Dissipation Edition are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SLI.

The R9 290 has a 272 MHz higher core clock speed and 48 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 460. This results in the R9 290 providing 75.9 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R9 290 has a 272 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 460 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the R9 290 providing 17.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 290 was released over three years more recently than the GTX 460, and so the R9 290 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 460 when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The R9 290 has 2048 MB more video memory than the GTX 460, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 290 also has superior memory performance overall.

The R9 290 has 89.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 460, which means that the memory performance of the R9 290 is much better than the GTX 460.

The Radeon R9 290 XFX Double Dissipation Edition has 2560 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 460 SLI has 672. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 290 is 2061 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 460 is 907. The R9 290 having 1154 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 290 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 460.

The R9 290 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 460. This means that the R9 290 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 460.

The Radeon R9 290 XFX Double Dissipation Edition requires 250 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 460 SLI requires 380 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 750 Watts for the R9 290 and a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the GTX 460. The GTX 460 requires 130 Watts more than the R9 290 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 460 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R9 290.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed947 MHzvs675 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Hawaii PROFermi GF104-300-KB-A1 (x2)
OC Potential Fair vs None
Driver Support Great vs Poor
Release Date20 Dec 2013vs01 Jul 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1600x900
10
green tick vs
9.1
1920x1080
9.5
green tick vs
7.3
2560x1440
7.2
green tick vs
4.3
3840x2160
5.5
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1250 MHzvs900 MHz
Memory Bus512 Bitvs512 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth320GB/secvs230.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 1024 KB green tick vs green tick 1024 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2560vs672
Actual Shader Performance99%vs44%
Technology28nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units160vs112
Texture Rate151.5 GTexel/svs75.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units64vs64
Pixel Rate60.6 GPixel/svs43.2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs4
HDMI Connections1vs2
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power250 Wattsvs380 Watts
Recommended PSU750 Wattsvs600 Watts & 26 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHz-
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution2560x1440vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon R9 290 XFX Double Dissipation Edition is a special edition of the high-end Radeon R9 290.
This edition features a custom cooling solution and no overclock out of the box meaning it offers exactly the same performance the reference Radeon R9 290 does.
GeForce GTX 460 SLI is a solution of two GeForce GTX 460 put together using NVIDIA'S SLI technology.
SLI relies a lot on proper driver support and may cause micro stuttering in FPS below 30. This means this combination might even perform worse than a single GTX 460.
The optimal performance it delivers is slightly better than a single GeForce GTX 480.
Therefore, this combination is sufficient for gaming at 1080p and most demanding games can be played at the highest settings.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-
-