Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R7 260X XFX Double D 2GB Edition | Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition |
Hitman 3 | 287% | 316% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 197% | 220% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 172% | 192% |
Resident Evil 8 | 197% | 220% |
FIFA 21 | 50% | 61% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 318% | 350% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 163% | 183% |
Genshin Impact | 197% | 220% |
Far Cry 6 | 330% | 363% |
The Medium | 271% | 299% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 260X XFX Double D 2GB Edition are very slightly better than the AMD Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition.
The R7 260X has a 70 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the R7 260X. This results in the R7 260X providing 3.9 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R7 260X has a 70 MHz higher core clock speed than the R7 260X and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the R7 260X providing 1.1 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
Both the Radeon R7 260X XFX Double D 2GB Edition and the Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition were released at the same time, so are likely to be quite similar.
The R7 260X has 1024 MB more video memory than the R7 260X, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R7 260X also has superior memory performance overall.
The R7 260X has 6.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R7 260X, which means that the memory performance of the R7 260X is marginally better than the R7 260X.
Both the Radeon R7 260X XFX Double D 2GB Edition and the Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition have 896 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the R7 260X is 838 and by the R7 260X is 784. Knowing that the shader performance of the R7 260X is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.
The Radeon R7 260X XFX Double D 2GB Edition requires 115 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition requires 105 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the R7 260X and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the R7 260X. The R7 260X requires 10 Watts more than the R7 260X to run. The difference is not significant enough for the R7 260X to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the R7 260X.
Core Speed | 1100 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1030 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | GCN 1.1 Bonaire XTX | GCN 1.1 Bonaire XT | |||
OC Potential | Poor | vs |
![]() | Fair | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | Good | |
Release Date | 08 Oct 2013 | vs | 08 Oct 2013 | ||
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | 9.9
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 8
|
![]() |
vs | 7.7
|
|
1920x1080 | 6.1
|
![]() |
vs | 5.9
|
|
2560x1440 | 4.4
|
![]() |
vs | 4.2
|
|
3840x2160 | 2.6
|
![]() |
vs | 2.5
|
Memory | 2048 MB | ![]() | vs | 1024 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1600 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1500 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 102.4GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 96GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
512 KB |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 896 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 896 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 40% | ![]() | vs | 38% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 56 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 56 |
Texture Rate | 61.6 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 57.7 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 16 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 16 |
Pixel Rate | 17.6 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 16.5 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 2 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2 |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
Comparison |
Max Power | 115 Watts | vs | ![]() | 105 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 500 Watts & 33 Amps | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 500 Watts & 33 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4.4 |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1600x900 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1600x900 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview Radeon R7 260X XFX Double D 2GB Edition is a Special Edition of AMD's Fast-Middle-Class Radeon R7 260X, created by XFX. Overclock: Central Unit None. Overclock: Memory Clock None. Frame Buffer Untouched. Cooling Solution XFX Double Dissipation Cooling: XFX's exclusive dual fan double dissipation design utilizes two larger fans which run at slower RPM than comparable single fan solutions which must run at much higher RPMs just to barely achieve the same cooling needs. Because of this design, XFX is able to achieve up to 13db lower noise than the competitor while simultaneously increasing the overall cooling by 7°C. Performance Benchmarks Indicate no Performance Boost over the Reference Radeon R7 260X. | Overview Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition is a Special Edition of AMD's Fast-Middle-Class Radeon R7 260X v2, created by PowerColor. Overclock: Central Unit The Central Unit has been increased from 1000MHz to 1030MHz. Overclock: Memory Clock None. Frame Buffer Untouched. Cooling Solution Untouched. Performance Benchmarks Indicate a 1% Performance Boost over the Reference Radeon R7 260X v2. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | |||||
GPU Variants | - | - |