Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon HD 6750 v2 PowerColor 1GB Edition | Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 606% | 154% |
Hitman 3 | 819% | 231% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 546% | 133% |
Resident Evil 8 | 606% | 154% |
FIFA 21 | 256% | 28% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 894% | 258% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 525% | 125% |
The Medium | 781% | 217% |
Genshin Impact | 606% | 154% |
Far Cry 6 | 922% | 268% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition are massively better than the AMD Radeon HD 6750 v2 PowerColor 1GB Edition.
The HD 7850 has a 275 MHz higher core clock speed and 28 more Texture Mapping Units than the HD 6750. This results in the HD 7850 providing 37.2 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The HD 7850 has a 275 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Render Output Units than the HD 6750. This results in the HD 7850 providing 20 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The HD 7850 was released less than a year after the HD 6750, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.
The Radeon HD 6750 v2 PowerColor 1GB Edition and the Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.
The HD 7850 has 128 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the HD 6750, which means that the memory performance of the HD 7850 is massively better than the HD 6750.
The Radeon HD 6750 v2 PowerColor 1GB Edition has 720 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition has 1024. However, the actual shader performance of the HD 6750 is 252 and the actual shader performance of the HD 7850 is 849. The HD 7850 having 597 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the HD 7850 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the HD 6750.
The HD 7850 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the HD 6750. This means that the HD 7850 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the HD 6750.
The Radeon HD 6750 v2 PowerColor 1GB Edition requires 86 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the HD 6750 and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the HD 7850. The HD 7850 has been recommended a PSU with 50 Watts more than the HD 6750. The difference is significant enough that the HD 7850 may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the HD 6750.
Core Speed | 700 MHz | vs | ![]() | 975 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | Terascale 2 Juniper PRO | GCN 1.0 Pitcairn PRO | |||
OC Potential | Fair |
![]() |
vs |
![]() | Fair |
Driver Support | Poor | vs | ![]() |
Good | |
Release Date | 01 Dec 2011 | vs | ![]() | 01 Jun 2012 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 5.3
|
vs | ![]() |
8.5
|
|
1920x1080 | 3.7
|
vs | ![]() |
6.6
|
|
2560x1440 | 2.5
|
vs | ![]() |
4.9
|
|
3840x2160 | - | vs | ![]() |
3.1
|
Memory | 1024 MB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1024 MB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 800 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1200 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | vs | ![]() | 256 Bit | |
Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 | |
Memory Bandwidth | 25.6GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 153.6GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 256 KB | vs | ![]() |
512 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 720 | vs | ![]() | 1024 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 12% | vs | ![]() | 41% | |
Technology | 40nm | vs | ![]() | 28nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 36 | vs | ![]() | 64 | |
Texture Rate | 25.2 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 62.4 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 16 | vs | ![]() | 32 | |
Pixel Rate | 11.2 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 31.2 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 2560x1600 | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
DVI Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 86 Watts | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 450 Watts & 30 Amps | ![]() | vs | 500 Watts |
DirectX | 11.0 | vs | ![]() | 12.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.3 | vs | ![]() | 4.4 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-530 2.9GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 3.0GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 4 GB | ![]() | vs | 8 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | vs | ![]() | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview Radeon HD 6750 v2 PowerColor 1GB Edition is a special edition of AMD's fast-middle-class Radeon HD 6750 v2, created by PowerColor. It doesn't have any new features. Read below to know more. Overclock Out of The Box The Clock Frequencies of both Central Unit and Operating Memory Clock Remain the Same. Cooling Solution The Cooling System remains the same. Performance Without Overclocking Out of The Box, RRadeon HD 6750 v2 PowerColor 1GB Edition is as fast as the reference Radeon HD 6750 v2. | Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition is a special edition of the powerful Radeon HD 7850. See the standard version for more information about it. The differences include an increase on the core-clock that went from 860MHz to 975MHz. Benchmarks indicate a 7% boost when compared to the standard edition. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | |||||
GPU Variants | - | - |