Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon HD 6750 v2 PowerColor 2GB Edition | Radeon R7 240 2GB |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 606% | 786% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 546% | 711% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 525% | 684% |
FIFA 21 | 256% | 347% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 894% | 1147% |
Hitman 3 | 819% | 1053% |
Genshin Impact | 606% | 786% |
Far Cry 6 | 922% | 1182% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 913% | 1171% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 581% | 755% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 6750 v2 PowerColor 2GB Edition are noticeably better than the AMD Radeon R7 240 2GB.
The R7 240 has a 30 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 6750, but the HD 6750 has 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the R7 240. As a result, the HD 6750 exhibits a 10.6 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R7 240. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R7 240 has a 30 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 6750, but the HD 6750 has 8 more Render Output Units than the R7 240. As a result, the HD 6750 exhibits a 5.4 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the R7 240. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R7 240 was released over a year more recently than the HD 6750, and so the R7 240 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the HD 6750.
The Radeon HD 6750 v2 PowerColor 2GB Edition and the Radeon R7 240 2GB have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.
The R7 240 has 7.5 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the HD 6750, which means that the memory performance of the R7 240 is marginally better than the HD 6750.
The Radeon HD 6750 v2 PowerColor 2GB Edition has 720 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R7 240 2GB has 320. However, the actual shader performance of the HD 6750 is 252 and the actual shader performance of the R7 240 is 212. The HD 6750 having 40 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the HD 6750 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R7 240.
The R7 240 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the HD 6750. This means that the R7 240 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the HD 6750.
The Radeon HD 6750 v2 PowerColor 2GB Edition requires 86 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 240 2GB requires 30 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the HD 6750 and a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 240. The HD 6750 requires 56 Watts more than the R7 240 to run. The difference is significant enough that the HD 6750 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R7 240.
Core Speed | 700 MHz | vs | ![]() | 730 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | ![]() | 780 MHz | |
Architecture | Terascale 2 Juniper PRO | GCN 1.1 Oland PRO | |||
OC Potential | Fair | vs |
![]() | Good | |
Driver Support | Poor | vs | ![]() |
Great | |
Release Date | 01 Dec 2011 | vs | ![]() | 08 Oct 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | vs | ![]() |
6.4
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 5.3
|
![]() |
vs | 4.9
|
|
1920x1080 | 3.7
|
![]() |
vs | 3.1
|
|
2560x1440 | 2.5
|
![]() |
vs | 2.3
|
|
3840x2160 | - | vs | ![]() |
1.5
|
Memory | 2048 MB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2048 MB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 667 MHz | vs | ![]() | 900 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit |
Memory Type | DDR3 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | DDR3 |
Memory Bandwidth | 21.3GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 28.8GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 256 KB | vs | ![]() |
512 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 720 | ![]() | vs | 320 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 12% | ![]() | vs | 10% | |
Technology | 40nm | vs | ![]() | 28nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 36 | ![]() | vs | 20 | |
Texture Rate | 25.2 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 14.6 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 16 | ![]() | vs | 8 | |
Pixel Rate | 11.2 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 5.8 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 2560x1600 | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DVI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 86 Watts | vs | ![]() | 30 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 450 Watts & 30 Amps | vs | ![]() | 400 Watts & 18 Amps |
DirectX | 11.0 | vs | ![]() | 12.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.3 | vs | ![]() | 4.4 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | no | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-530 2.9GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 4 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1366x768 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview Radeon HD 6750 v2 PowerColor 2GB Edition is a special edition of AMD's fast-middle-class Radeon HD 6750 v2, created by PowerColor. It doesn't have any new features. Read below to know more. Overclock Out of The Box The Clock Frequencies of both Central Unit and Operating Memory Clock Remain the Same. Cooling Solution The Cooling System remains the same. Performance Without Overclocking Out of The Box, RRadeon HD 6750 v2 PowerColor 2GB Edition is as fast as the reference Radeon HD 6750 v2. | Note: This Graphics Card has 2 variants: one with DDR3 and another with GDDR5. This is the DDR3 Version. Radeon R7 240 2GB offers a core codenamed Oland PRO and thus features 320 Shader Processing Units, 20 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on a 128-bit bus width of standard DDR3. While the central unit runs at 730MHz and goes up to 780MHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 900MHz. With a rated board TDP of 30W, it requires no extra power connectors. Compared to Radeon R7 250, its performance is significantly lower (over 25% slower), especially at higher resolutions due to the limited memory bandwidth. Still, the TDP is relatively low and so this card may be used on low end systems and offer a reasonable upgrade, when compared to integrated graphics. |
---|