Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTS 250 Zotac ECO 1GB Edition GeForce GTX 980 4GB SLI
Cyberpunk 2077 538% 31%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 489% 36%
Genshin Impact 544% 30%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 555% 29%
eFootball PES 2021 225% 65%
FIFA 21 225% 65%
Marvel's Avengers 510% 34%
Watch Dogs Legion 521% 33%
Mafia: Definitive Edition 823% 0%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 470% 38%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 4GB SLI are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce GTS 250 Zotac ECO 1GB Edition.

The GTX 980 has a 451 MHz higher core clock speed and 192 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTS 250. This results in the GTX 980 providing 245.1 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 980 has a 451 MHz higher core clock speed and 112 more Render Output Units than the GTS 250. This results in the GTX 980 providing 133.3 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 980 was released over three years more recently than the GTS 250, and so the GTX 980 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTS 250 when running the latest games.

The GTX 980 has 7168 MB more video memory than the GTS 250, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 980 also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 980 has 384.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTS 250, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 980 is massively better than the GTS 250.

The GeForce GTS 250 Zotac ECO 1GB Edition has 128 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 980 4GB SLI has 4096. However, the actual shader performance of the GTS 250 is 216 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 980 is 6724. The GTX 980 having 6508 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 980 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTS 250.

The GTX 980 transistor size technology is 27 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTS 250. This means that the GTX 980 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTS 250.

The GeForce GTS 250 Zotac ECO 1GB Edition requires 125 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 980 4GB SLI requires 350 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the GTS 250 and a PSU with at least 750 Watts for the GTX 980. The GTX 980 requires 225 Watts more than the GTS 250 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 980 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTS 250.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed675 MHzvs1126 MHz
Boost Clock-vs1216 MHz
ArchitectureTesla G92-428-B1Maxwell GM204-400-A1 (x2)
OC Potential Fair vs Fair
Driver Support Poor vs Great
Release Date01 Sep 2009vs19 Sep 2014
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900
5.4
vs green tick
10
1920x1080
4
vs green tick
10
2560x1440
2.5
vs green tick
9.9
3840x2160
1.7
vs green tick
7.8

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvs8192 MB
Memory Speed1000 MHzvs1753 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs512 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth64GB/secvs448.8GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 4096 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs yes
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units128vs4096
Actual Shader Performance10%vs100%
Technology55nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units64vs256
Texture Rate43.2 GTexel/svs288.3 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs128
Pixel Rate10.8 GPixel/svs144.1 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs4096x2160
VGA Connections1vs0
DVI Connections1vs1
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power125 Wattsvs350 Watts
Recommended PSU400 Watts & 29 Ampsvs750 Watts & 42 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX10.0vs12.1
Shader Model4.0vs5.0
Open GL3.3vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core 2 Duo E7500 2.93GHzvsIntel Core i7-5820K 6-Core 3.3GHz
Recommended RAM6 GBvs16 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs5760x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTS 250 Zotac ECO 1GB Edition is a special edition of NVIDIA's fast-middle-class GeForce GTS 250, created by Zotac.

Overclock Out of The Box
The Central unit is actually underclocked reducing the power consumption and thus reducing the heat produced.

Cooling Solution
The Cooling System was replaced by Zotac's Single Fan Cooler, meaning the card runs cooler under load.

Performance
Because of being underclocked, GeForce GTS 250 Zotac ECO 1GB Edition is actually slower than the reference GeForce GTS 250.
Overview
GeForce GTX 980 4GB SLI is a solution of two GeForce GTX 980 4GB put together using NVIDIA's SLI technology.

Architecture
The Second variant of the Maxwell Architecture, despite being also manufactured with a 28nm technology, has an extremely large L2 Cache and features a Third Generation Delta Color Compression which allows NVIDIA to produce Graphics Cards with relatively small memory data transfer rates, without causing too much impact on the overall performance. Furthermore, the Shaders have been redesigned and are both more powerful and energy efficient.

GPU
It consists of 2 GPUs codenamed GM204-400-A1 which, together, offer 4096 Shader Processing Units, 256 TMUs and 128 ROPs, on a 512-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 1126MHz and goes up to 1216MHz, in Turbo Mode, while the memory clock operates at 1753MHz.

Power Consumption
Power Consumption lies between 300W and 400W.

Performance
Gaming benchmarks prove that at 4K (3840x2160) GeForce GTX 980 4GB SLI is over 7% faster than AMD's Radeon R9 295X2.

System Suggestions
We recommend a very strong processor (Intel Core i7 Six Core/AMD FX Eight Core) and 16GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 980 4GB SLI.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-
-