Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | GeForce GT 230 v2 | Radeon R7 240 2GB |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1122% | 786% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 1017% | 711% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 981% | 684% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 1619% | 1147% |
FIFA 21 | 516% | 347% |
Genshin Impact | 1122% | 786% |
Far Cry 6 | 1668% | 1182% |
Hitman 3 | 1489% | 1053% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 1078% | 755% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 1651% | 1171% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 240 2GB are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GT 230 v2.
The R7 240 has a 230 MHz higher core clock speed than the GT 230, but the GT 230 has 28 more Texture Mapping Units than the R7 240. As a result, the GT 230 exhibits a 9.4 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R7 240. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R7 240 has a 230 MHz higher core clock speed than the GT 230, but the GT 230 has 4 more Render Output Units than the R7 240. As a result, the GT 230 exhibits a 0.2 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the R7 240. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R7 240 was released over three years more recently than the GT 230, and so the R7 240 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GT 230 when running the latest games.
The R7 240 has 512 MB more video memory than the GT 230, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R7 240 also has superior memory performance overall.
The R7 240 has 4.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GT 230, which means that the memory performance of the R7 240 is marginally better than the GT 230.
The GeForce GT 230 v2 has 96 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R7 240 2GB has 320. However, the actual shader performance of the GT 230 is 120 and the actual shader performance of the R7 240 is 212. The R7 240 having 92 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R7 240 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GT 230.
The R7 240 transistor size technology is 27 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GT 230. This means that the R7 240 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GT 230.
The GeForce GT 230 v2 requires 75 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 240 2GB requires 30 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GT 230 and a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 240. The GT 230 requires 45 Watts more than the R7 240 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GT 230 may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R7 240.
Core Speed | 500 MHz | vs | ![]() | 730 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | ![]() | 780 MHz | |
Architecture | Tesla G92b | GCN 1.1 Oland PRO | |||
OC Potential | Fair | vs |
![]() | Good | |
Driver Support | Poor | vs | ![]() |
Great | |
Release Date | 01 Oct 2009 | vs | ![]() | 08 Oct 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | vs | ![]() |
6.4
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 4.1
|
vs | ![]() |
4.9
|
|
1920x1080 | 2.6
|
vs | ![]() |
3.1
|
|
2560x1440 | 1.7
|
vs | ![]() |
2.3
|
|
3840x2160 | - | vs | ![]() |
1.5
|
Memory | 1536 MB | vs | ![]() | 2048 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 500 MHz | vs | ![]() | 900 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 192 Bit | ![]() | vs | 128 Bit | |
Memory Type | DDR2 | vs | ![]() | DDR3 | |
Memory Bandwidth | 24GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 28.8GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 0 KB | vs | ![]() |
512 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 96 | vs | ![]() | 320 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 6% | vs | ![]() | 10% | |
Technology | 55nm | vs | ![]() | 28nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 48 | ![]() | vs | 20 | |
Texture Rate | 24 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 14.6 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 12 | ![]() | vs | 8 | |
Pixel Rate | 6 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 5.8 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 2560x1600 | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DVI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 75 Watts | vs | ![]() | 30 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 300 Watts & 22 Amps | ![]() | vs | 400 Watts & 18 Amps |
DirectX | 10.0 | vs | ![]() | 12.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 4.0 | vs | ![]() | 5.0 | |
Open GL | 3.3 | vs | ![]() | 4.4 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3.0GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 4 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1366x768 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview GeForce GT 230 v2 is a Middle-Class Graphics Card based on the First Revision of the Tesla Architecture. Architecture Tesla was NVIDIA's First Unified Shader Architecture. GPU It equips a GPU Codenamed G92b which has 6 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 96 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 12 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 500MHz. Memory The GPU accesses a 1.5GB frame buffer of DDR2, through a 192-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 500MHz. Features DirectX 10.0 Support (10.0 Hardware Default) and support for NVIDIA PureVideo HD Technology, Dual-stream Hardware Acceleration, PhysX, CUDA, HybridPower and other technologies. Cooling Solution The Cooling Solution consists of a Single-Fan. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 75W, it relies entirely on the PCI Slot for Power meaning no extra connectors are required. Performance Gaming benchmarks put its performance on level with a Radeon HD 5570, meaning it is slightly faster than the more recent Fermi GeForce GT 430. | Note: This Graphics Card has 2 variants: one with DDR3 and another with GDDR5. This is the DDR3 Version. Radeon R7 240 2GB offers a core codenamed Oland PRO and thus features 320 Shader Processing Units, 20 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on a 128-bit bus width of standard DDR3. While the central unit runs at 730MHz and goes up to 780MHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 900MHz. With a rated board TDP of 30W, it requires no extra power connectors. Compared to Radeon R7 250, its performance is significantly lower (over 25% slower), especially at higher resolutions due to the limited memory bandwidth. Still, the TDP is relatively low and so this card may be used on low end systems and offer a reasonable upgrade, when compared to integrated graphics. |
---|