Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 7290 Mobility Radeon X1350
Cyberpunk 2077 6357% 9641%
Hitman 3 8300% 12572%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 5806% 8809%
Resident Evil 8 6357% 9641%
FIFA 21 3157% 4814%
Grand Theft Auto VI 8986% 13607%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 5614% 8521%
The Medium 7957% 12055%
Genshin Impact 6357% 9641%
Far Cry 6 9243% 13995%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 7290 are significantly better than the AMD Mobility Radeon X1350.

The Mobility Radeon X1350 has a 139 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon HD 7290, but the Radeon HD 7290 has 4 more Texture Mapping Units than the Mobility Radeon X1350. As a result, the Radeon HD 7290 exhibits a 0.5 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the Mobility Radeon X1350. Neither of these GPUs support DirectX 10 or higher, so Texture Rate holds more weight than when comparing more modern GPUs.

The Mobility Radeon X1350 has a 139 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon HD 7290 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the Mobility Radeon X1350 providing 0.6 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon HD 7290 was released over three years more recently than the Mobility Radeon X1350, and so the Radeon HD 7290 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Mobility Radeon X1350 when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Mobility Radeon X1350 has 128 MB video memory, but the Radeon HD 7290 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon HD 7290 has 80 Shader Processing Units and the Mobility Radeon X1350 has 4. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD 7290 is 16 and the actual shader performance of the Mobility Radeon X1350 is 1. The Radeon HD 7290 having 15 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Radeon HD 7290 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Mobility Radeon X1350.

The Radeon HD 7290 transistor size technology is 60 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Mobility Radeon X1350. This means that the Radeon HD 7290 is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Mobility Radeon X1350. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the Radeon HD 7290 should consume less power than the Mobility Radeon X1350.

The Radeon HD 7290 requires 9 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Mobility Radeon X1350.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed280 MHzvs419 MHz
Boost Clock400 MHzvs-
ArchitectureTerascale 2 LovelandM62
OC Potential None vs Poor
Driver Support Poor vs -
Release Date05 Jun 2012vs18 Sep 2006
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
2.1
green tick vs -
1600x900
1.5
green tick vs -
1920x1080
0.8
green tick vs -
2560x1440
0.5
green tick vs -
3840x2160 - green tick vs green tick -

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs128 MB
Memory Speed533 MHzvs392 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth8.5GB/secvs6.3GB/sec
L2 Cache 1024 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units80vs4
Actual Shader Performance1%vs0%
Technology40nmvs100nm
Texture Mapping Units8vs4
Texture Rate2.2 GTexel/svs1.7 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs4
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs1.7 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs-
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power9 Watts-
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11.0vs9.0c
Shader Model5.0vs3.0
Open GL4.3vs3.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorAMD APU C-70-
Recommended RAM3 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1280x720-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon HD 7290 is an Integrated Graphics Card, on the APU C-70, based on the second revision of the Terascale Architecture.

Architecture
The Second variant of the Terascale 2 Architecture is still manufactured with a 40nm technology and despite allowing more Stream Cores, their design remains more or less the same compared to the first variant.

GPU
It equips a GPU codenamed Loveland which has 1 Compute Units activated and thus offers 80 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs. The Central Unit Initially Runs at 280MHz and goes up to 400MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU Shares the System's RAM which varies from laptop to laptop. Typically, the GPU reserves 1GB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on the at which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. In this case, it is 533MHz.
It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus Radeon HD 7310's performance may vary from system to system.

Features
DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for HD3D, Eyefinity, App Acceleration, PowerPlay and other technologies.

Performance
Radeon HD 7290 is a direct re-brand of Radeon HD 6290.
Gaming benchmarks put its performance on level with the older Radeon HD 6290.

System Suggestions
We recommend 4GB of RAM for a system with Radeon HD 7290.
Mobility Radeon X1350 is at essence a higher-clocked Mobility Radeon X1300. Beware that this Graphics Card is based on a NON-Shader Unified architecture and thus DirectX 10 and forth games aren't supported, not even via software.
Its performance, extremely puny, is only capable of running 2005 (and before) games fluently.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-