Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R9 280X Sapphire Vapor-X 3GB OC Edition Crossfire | Radeon R9 270X Crossfire |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1% | 21% |
Hitman 3 | 31% | 58% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 8% | 11% |
Resident Evil 8 | 1% | 21% |
FIFA 21 | 49% | 39% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 42% | 71% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 11% | 7% |
Genshin Impact | 1% | 21% |
The Medium | 26% | 51% |
Far Cry 6 | 46% | 76% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 280X Sapphire Vapor-X 3GB OC Edition Crossfire are noticeably better than the AMD Radeon R9 270X Crossfire.
The R9 270X has a 50 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 280X, but the R9 280X has 96 more Texture Mapping Units than the R9 270X. As a result, the R9 280X exhibits a 83.2 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R9 270X. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R9 270X has a 50 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 280X and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the R9 270X providing 3.2 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
Both the Radeon R9 280X Sapphire Vapor-X 3GB OC Edition Crossfire and the Radeon R9 270X Crossfire were released at the same time, so are likely to be quite similar.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The R9 280X has 2048 MB more video memory than the R9 270X, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 280X also has superior memory performance overall.
The R9 280X has 236.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R9 270X, which means that the memory performance of the R9 280X is massively better than the R9 270X.
The Radeon R9 280X Sapphire Vapor-X 3GB OC Edition Crossfire has 4096 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R9 270X Crossfire has 2560. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 280X is 4383 and the actual shader performance of the R9 270X is 2285. The R9 280X having 2098 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 280X delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R9 270X.
The Radeon R9 280X Sapphire Vapor-X 3GB OC Edition Crossfire requires 500 Watts to run and the Radeon R9 270X Crossfire requires 360 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 750 Watts for the R9 270X, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the R9 280X. The R9 280X requires 140 Watts more than the R9 270X to run. The difference is significant enough that the R9 280X may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R9 270X.
Core Speed | 950 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1000 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1070 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1050 MHz | |
Architecture | GCN 1.1 Tahiti XTL (x2) | GCN 1.1 Curacao XT (x2) | |||
OC Potential | Fair |
![]() |
vs | Poor | |
Driver Support | - | vs | Great | ||
Release Date | 08 Oct 2013 | vs | 08 Oct 2013 | ||
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
1920x1080 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | 9.6
|
|
2560x1440 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
3840x2160 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
Memory | 6144 MB | ![]() | vs | 4096 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1550 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1400 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 768 Bit | ![]() | vs | 512 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 595.2GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 358.4GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 1536 KB | ![]() |
vs | 1024 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 4096 | ![]() | vs | 2560 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 100% | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 100% |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 256 | ![]() | vs | 160 | |
Texture Rate | 243.2 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 160 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 64 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 64 |
Pixel Rate | 60.8 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 64 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 500 Watts | vs | ![]() | 360 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | - | 750 Watts |
DirectX | 11.2 | vs | ![]() | 12.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.3 | vs | ![]() | 4.4 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-3570K 3.4GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 2560x1440 | ![]() | vs | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | The Crossfire setup of Radeon R9 280X Sapphire Vapor-X 3GB OC Edition. | Radeon R9 270X Crossfire is a solution of two Radeon R9 270X put together using AMD'S Crossfire technology. Check the page of Radeon R9 270X to know more about its chip. Crossfire relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is up to x% better than a single Radeon R9 270X performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports crossfire or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single Radeon R9 270X. Expect this combination to draw up to 360 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower. Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | - | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |