Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | GeForce GTX 960 EVGA Superclocked 2GB Edition | Radeon R9 280X Crossfire |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 66% | 5% |
Hitman 3 | 116% | 36% |
Resident Evil 8 | 66% | 5% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 52% | 4% |
FIFA 21 | 16% | 47% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 134% | 47% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 47% | 7% |
Genshin Impact | 66% | 5% |
Far Cry 6 | 141% | 52% |
The Medium | 107% | 31% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 280X Crossfire are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 EVGA Superclocked 2GB Edition.
The GTX 960 has a 366 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 280X, but the R9 280X has 192 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 960. As a result, the R9 280X exhibits a 139.8 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 960. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GTX 960 has a 366 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 280X, but the R9 280X has 32 more Render Output Units than the GTX 960. As a result, the R9 280X exhibits a 15.5 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 960. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The GTX 960 was released over a year more recently than the R9 280X, and so the GTX 960 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the R9 280X.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The R9 280X has 4096 MB more video memory than the GTX 960, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 280X also has superior memory performance overall.
The R9 280X has 463.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 960, which means that the memory performance of the R9 280X is massively better than the GTX 960.
The GeForce GTX 960 EVGA Superclocked 2GB Edition has 1024 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R9 280X Crossfire has 4096. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 960 is 1768. The R9 280X having 2328 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 280X delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 960.
The GeForce GTX 960 EVGA Superclocked 2GB Edition requires 120 Watts to run and the Radeon R9 280X Crossfire requires 550 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the GTX 960 and a PSU with at least 1000 Watts for the R9 280X. The R9 280X requires 430 Watts more than the GTX 960 to run. The difference is significant enough that the R9 280X may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 960.
Core Speed | 1216 MHz | ![]() | vs | 850 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1279 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1000 MHz | |
Architecture | Maxwell GM206-300-A1 | GCN 1.1 Tahiti XTL (x2) | |||
OC Potential | Fair | vs |
![]() | Fair | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | - | |
Release Date | 22 Jan 2015 | ![]() | vs | 01 Oct 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
1920x1080 | 8.3
|
vs | ![]() |
10
|
|
2560x1440 | 6
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
3840x2160 | 4.4
|
![]() |
vs | - |
Memory | 2048 MB | vs | ![]() | 6144 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1753 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1500 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | vs | ![]() | 768 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 112.2GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 576GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 1024 KB | vs | ![]() |
1536 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | yes | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 1024 | vs | ![]() | 4096 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 85% | vs | ![]() | 100% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 64 | vs | ![]() | 256 | |
Texture Rate | 77.8 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 217.6 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 32 | vs | ![]() | 64 | |
Pixel Rate | 38.9 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 54.4 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 5120x3200 | ![]() | vs | 4096x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 120 Watts | ![]() | vs | 550 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 400 Watts & 29 Amps | ![]() | vs | 1000 Watts & 42 Amps |
DirectX | 12.1 | ![]() | vs | 11.2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | 4.3 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | no | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-4690K 3.5GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K 4-Core 3.5GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1920x1080 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview GeForce GTX 960 EVGA Superclocked 2GB Edition is a special edition of NVIDIA's Performance GeForce GTX 960 2GB, created by EVGA. Overclock: Central Unit The Central Unit now runs at 1216MHz, instead of 1127MHz and goes up to 1279MHz, in Turbo Mode. Overclock: Memory Clock The Operating Memory Clock and the Frame Buffer remain the same. Cooling Solution The Cooling System remains the same. Performance Benchmarks indicate a 3% performance over the reference GeForce GTX 960 2GB. | Radeon R9 280X Crossfire is a solution of two Radeon R9 280X put together using AMD'S Crossfire technology. Check the page of Radeon R9 280X to know more about its chip. Crossfire relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is up to 60% better than a single Radeon R9 280X performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports crossfire or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single Radeon R9 280X. Expect this combination to draw up to 550 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower. Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | - | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |