0
Check Prices $249.00
0
Check Prices $279.00
Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 4890 Sapphire Toxic 1GB Edition GeForce GTX 465
Cyberpunk 2077 264% 265%
Hitman 3 373% 374%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 233% 233%
Resident Evil 8 264% 265%
FIFA 21 83% 84%
Grand Theft Auto VI 412% 413%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 222% 223%
Genshin Impact 264% 265%
The Medium 354% 355%
Far Cry 6 426% 427%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 4890 Sapphire Toxic 1GB Edition are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 465.

The HD 4890 has a 353 MHz higher core clock speed but 4 fewer Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce GTX 465. The lower TMU count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the HD 4890 manages to provide 11.7 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The HD 4890 has a 353 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 465, but the GeForce GTX 465 has 16 more Render Output Units than the HD 4890. As a result, the GeForce GTX 465 exhibits a 4 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the HD 4890. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce GTX 465 was released less than a year after the HD 4890, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The Radeon HD 4890 Sapphire Toxic 1GB Edition and the GeForce GTX 465 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The HD 4890 has 31.7 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GTX 465, which means that the memory performance of the HD 4890 is noticeably better than the GeForce GTX 465.

The Radeon HD 4890 Sapphire Toxic 1GB Edition has 800 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 465 has 352. However, the actual shader performance of the HD 4890 is 538 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 465 is 427. The HD 4890 having 111 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the HD 4890 delivers a noticeably smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce GTX 465.

The GeForce GTX 465 transistor size technology is 15 nm (nanometers) smaller than the HD 4890. This means that the GeForce GTX 465 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the HD 4890. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the GeForce GTX 465 should consume less power than the HD 4890.

The Radeon HD 4890 Sapphire Toxic 1GB Edition requires 190 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 465 requires 200 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the HD 4890 and a PSU with at least 550 Watts for the GeForce GTX 465. The GeForce GTX 465 requires 10 Watts more than the HD 4890 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GeForce GTX 465 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the HD 4890.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed960 MHzvs607 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureR700 RV790 XTFermi GF100-030-A3
OC Potential Poor vs Fair
Driver Support Poor vs Poor
Release Date26 May 2009vs01 May 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - vs green tick
9.4
1600x900
7.1
vs green tick
7.2
1920x1080
5.5
green tick vs green tick
5.5
2560x1440
3.6
green tick vs green tick
3.6
3840x2160
2.4
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed1050 MHzvs802 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth134.4GB/secvs102.7GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units800vs352
Actual Shader Performance26%vs21%
Technology55nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units40vs44
Texture Rate38.4 GTexel/svs26.7 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs32
Pixel Rate15.4 GPixel/svs19.4 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs2
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power190 Wattsvs200 Watts
Recommended PSU500 Watts & 37 Ampsvs550 Watts & 30 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX10.1vs12.0
Shader Model4.1vs5.0
Open GL3.3vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core 2 Quad Q9550 2.83GHzvsIntel Core i5-760 2.8GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon HD 4890 Sapphire Toxic 1GB Edition is a special edition of AMD's High-End Radeon HD 4890, created by Sapphire.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit now runs at 960MHz, instead of 850MHz.

Overclock: Memory Clock
The Operating Memory Clock now runs at 1050MHz while the Frame Buffer remain the same.

Cooling Solution
The Cooling System has been replaced by Sapphire's Vapor-X Cooling Solution, which has cooling module on the GPU together with a heatsink and profiled fan venting heat out of the case.

Performance
Benchmarks indicate a 9% performance over the reference Radeon HD 4890.
GeForce GTX 465 is a high-end GPU based on the 40nm Fermi architecture.
It's based on the Fermi GF100 Core (optimized GF104 Core) and offers 352 Shader Processing Units, 42 TMUs and 32 ROPs, on 256-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 607MHz and the memory clock operates at 802MHz.
Despite feature more Shader Processing Units than GeForce GTX 460, it's lower clocked. Benchmarks indicate that its performance is around 3% better than the standard version and therefore on level with GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Most modern demanding games will run at the highest settings using a 1080p resolution. However, some will require reduced settings to be played optimally.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants
-