Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R7 250 v2 XFX Core 1GB Edition | GeForce GT 640 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 504% | 653% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 453% | 589% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 435% | 567% |
Hitman 3 | 686% | 880% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 750% | 960% |
FIFA 21 | 205% | 280% |
Far Cry 6 | 774% | 990% |
Genshin Impact | 504% | 653% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 766% | 980% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 483% | 627% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 250 v2 XFX Core 1GB Edition are noticeably better than the Nvidia GeForce GT 640.
The R7 250 has a 98 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GT 640, but the GeForce GT 640 has 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the R7 250. As a result, the GeForce GT 640 exhibits a 4.9 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R7 250. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R7 250 has a 98 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GT 640, but the GeForce GT 640 has 8 more Render Output Units than the R7 250. As a result, the GeForce GT 640 exhibits a 6.4 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the R7 250. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R7 250 was released over a year more recently than the GeForce GT 640, and so the R7 250 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce GT 640.
The GeForce GT 640 has 1024 MB more video memory than the R7 250, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GeForce GT 640 also has superior memory performance overall.
The GeForce GT 640 has 2.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R7 250, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce GT 640 is marginally better than the R7 250.
Both the Radeon R7 250 v2 XFX Core 1GB Edition and the GeForce GT 640 have 384 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the GeForce GT 640 is 346 and by the R7 250 is 346. Knowing that the shader performance of the GeForce GT 640 is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.
The Radeon R7 250 v2 XFX Core 1GB Edition requires 65 Watts to run and the GeForce GT 640 requires 65 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 250 and a PSU with at least 350 Watts for the GeForce GT 640. The two GPUs require the same amount of wattage to run. As such, there is no need to worry about which will more significantly affect your yearly electricity bills.
Core Speed | 1000 MHz | ![]() | vs | 902 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Architecture | GCN 1.1 Oland XT | Kepler GK107-300-A2 | |||
OC Potential | Poor | vs |
![]() | Fair | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | Good | |
Release Date | 09 Oct 2013 | ![]() | vs | 05 Jun 2012 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | vs | ![]() |
6.6
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 5.4
|
![]() |
vs | 5.1
|
|
1920x1080 | 4.2
|
![]() |
vs | 3.5
|
|
2560x1440 | 2.7
|
![]() |
vs | 2.5
|
|
3840x2160 | 1.7
|
![]() |
vs | ![]() |
1.7
|
Memory | 1024 MB | vs | ![]() | 2048 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 800 MHz | vs | ![]() | 891 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit |
Memory Type | DDR3 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | DDR3 |
Memory Bandwidth | 25.6GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 28.5GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | ![]() |
vs | 256 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 384 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 384 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 17% | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 17% |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 24 | vs | ![]() | 32 | |
Texture Rate | 24 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 28.9 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 8 | vs | ![]() | 16 | |
Pixel Rate | 8 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 14.4 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 2560x1600 | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DVI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 65 Watts | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 65 Watts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 400 Watts & 29 Amps | vs | ![]() | 350 Watts & 26 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | vs | ![]() | 4.5 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | no | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Core i3-3220 3.3GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 4 GB | ![]() | vs | 8 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1366x768 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview Radeon R7 250 v2 XFX Core 1GB Edition is a special edition of AMD's Fast-Middle-Class Radeon R7 250 v2 2GB, created by XFX. Overclock: Central Unit The Central Unit runs at the same speed. Overclock: Memory Clock The Operating Memory Clock remains the same and the Frame Buffer was halved to 1GB. Cooling Solution The Cooling System remains the same. Performance Without Overclocking Out of The Box, Radeon R7 250 v2 XFX Core 1GB Edition is as fast as the reference Radeon R7 250 v2. | Overview GeForce GT 640 is a Middle-Class Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Kepler Architecture. Architecture The Kepler Architecture was NVIDIA's big step to power efficiency. Each Stream Multiprocessor (SMX) now hosts 192 Shader Processing Units - against the 48 of older Fermi Architecture, and has been redesigned being now clocked at the same speed of the Central Unit. This means they are more energy efficient and will consequently lead to cooler operating temperatures. However, it also means they are weaker. It can be said that one Fermi SMX is as fast as 2 Kepler SMXs. Additionally, and not available in all GPUs, Kepler also introduced the Boost Clock Feature. The Boost Clock is an even higher Clock Speed activated when in gaming mode and becomes the effective speed of the GPU. GPU It equips a GPU Codenamed GK107-300-A2 which has 2 Stream Multiprocessor activated and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 32 TMUs and 16 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 902MHz. Memory The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 891MHz. Features DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for Optimus, CUDA, OpenCL, DirectCompute, 3D Vision Surround, PhysX, Realtime Raytracing and other technologies Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 65W, it requires at least a 350W PSU and it relies entirely on the PCI Slot for power, meaning no extra connectors are required. Performance Gaming benchmarks put its performance on average with Radeon HD 6670. System Suggestions We recommend a Modest Processor (Intel Core i3) and 8GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GT 640. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - |