Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 750 Ti MSI Low Profile 2GB Edition GeForce GTX 465
Cyberpunk 2077 183% 265%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 158% 233%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 150% 223%
FIFA 21 43% 84%
Grand Theft Auto VI 298% 413%
Hitman 3 268% 374%
Genshin Impact 183% 265%
Far Cry 6 309% 427%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 305% 423%
Watch Dogs Legion 173% 252%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti MSI Low Profile 2GB Edition are noticeably better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 465.

The GTX 750 Ti has a 413 MHz higher core clock speed but 4 fewer Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce GTX 465. The lower TMU count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the GTX 750 Ti manages to provide 14.1 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 750 Ti has a 413 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 465, but the GeForce GTX 465 has 16 more Render Output Units than the GTX 750 Ti. As a result, the GeForce GTX 465 exhibits a 3.1 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 750 Ti. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 750 Ti was released over three years more recently than the GeForce GTX 465, and so the GTX 750 Ti is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce GTX 465 when running the latest games.

The GTX 750 Ti has 1024 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 465, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, the overall memory performance is about the same.

The GeForce GTX 465 has 16.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 750 Ti, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce GTX 465 is slightly better than the GTX 750 Ti.

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti MSI Low Profile 2GB Edition has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 465 has 352. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 Ti is 937 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 465 is 427. The GTX 750 Ti having 510 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 750 Ti delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce GTX 465.

The GTX 750 Ti transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce GTX 465. This means that the GTX 750 Ti is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce GTX 465.

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti MSI Low Profile 2GB Edition requires 60 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 465 requires 200 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the GTX 750 Ti and a PSU with at least 550 Watts for the GeForce GTX 465. The GeForce GTX 465 requires 140 Watts more than the GTX 750 Ti to run. The difference is significant enough that the GeForce GTX 465 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 750 Ti.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1020 MHzvs607 MHz
Boost Clock1085 MHzvs-
ArchitectureMaxwell GM107-400-A2Fermi GF100-030-A3
OC Potential Good vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Poor
Release Date01 Nov 2014vs01 May 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - vs green tick
9.4
1600x900
8
green tick vs
7.2
1920x1080
6.4
green tick vs
5.5
2560x1440
4.5
green tick vs
3.6
3840x2160
2.8
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed1350 MHzvs802 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth86.4GB/secvs102.7GB/sec
L2 Cache 2048 KB green tick vs 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units640vs352
Actual Shader Performance45%vs21%
Technology28nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units40vs44
Texture Rate40.8 GTexel/svs26.7 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs32
Pixel Rate16.3 GPixel/svs19.4 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections1vs0
DVI Connections1vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power60 Wattsvs200 Watts
Recommended PSU400 Watts & 29 Ampsvs550 Watts & 30 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4430 3.0GHzvsIntel Core i5-760 2.8GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 750 Ti MSI Low Profile 2GB Edition is a special edition of NVIDIA's Fast-Middle-Class GeForce GT 750 Ti, created by MSI.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit runs at the same speed.

Overclock: Memory Clock
The Operating Memory Clock and the Frame Buffer remain the same.

Cooling Solution
The Cooling System has been replaced by MSI's Dual Fan Cooling Solution, meaning the Graphics Card is silent under load.

Performance
Without Overclocking Out of The Box, GeForce GTX 750 Ti MSI Low Profile 2GB Edition is as fast as the reference GeForce GT 750 Ti.
GeForce GTX 465 is a high-end GPU based on the 40nm Fermi architecture.
It's based on the Fermi GF100 Core (optimized GF104 Core) and offers 352 Shader Processing Units, 42 TMUs and 32 ROPs, on 256-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 607MHz and the memory clock operates at 802MHz.
Despite feature more Shader Processing Units than GeForce GTX 460, it's lower clocked. Benchmarks indicate that its performance is around 3% better than the standard version and therefore on level with GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Most modern demanding games will run at the highest settings using a 1080p resolution. However, some will require reduced settings to be played optimally.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants
-