Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | GeForce GT 640 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition | Radeon R7 240 2GB |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 598% | 786% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 538% | 711% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 517% | 684% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 881% | 1147% |
FIFA 21 | 252% | 347% |
Genshin Impact | 598% | 786% |
Far Cry 6 | 909% | 1182% |
Hitman 3 | 807% | 1053% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 573% | 755% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 900% | 1171% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GT 640 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition are noticeably better than the AMD Radeon R7 240 2GB.
The GT 640 has a 320 MHz higher core clock speed and 12 more Texture Mapping Units than the R7 240. This results in the GT 640 providing 19 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GT 640 has a 320 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Render Output Units than the R7 240. This results in the GT 640 providing 11 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R7 240 was released over a year more recently than the GT 640, and so the R7 240 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GT 640.
The GeForce GT 640 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition and the Radeon R7 240 2GB have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.
The memory bandwidth of the GeForce GT 640 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition and the Radeon R7 240 2GB are the same, which means the GT 640 and the R7 240 have equal limitations when it comes to graphical data transfer.
The GeForce GT 640 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition has 384 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R7 240 2GB has 320. However, the actual shader performance of the GT 640 is 403 and the actual shader performance of the R7 240 is 212. The GT 640 having 191 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GT 640 delivers a slightly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R7 240.
The GeForce GT 640 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition requires 65 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 240 2GB requires 30 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 350 Watts for the GT 640 and a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 240. The GT 640 requires 35 Watts more than the R7 240 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GT 640 may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R7 240.
Core Speed | 1050 MHz | ![]() | vs | 730 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | ![]() | 780 MHz | |
Architecture | Kepler GK107-300-A2 | GCN 1.1 Oland PRO | |||
OC Potential | Poor | vs |
![]() | Good | |
Driver Support | Good | vs | ![]() |
Great | |
Release Date | 05 Jun 2012 | vs | ![]() | 08 Oct 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | vs | ![]() |
6.4
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 5.3
|
![]() |
vs | 4.9
|
|
1920x1080 | 3.8
|
![]() |
vs | 3.1
|
|
2560x1440 | 2.6
|
![]() |
vs | 2.3
|
|
3840x2160 | 1.8
|
![]() |
vs | 1.5
|
Memory | 2048 MB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2048 MB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 900 MHz | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 900 MHz |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit |
Memory Type | DDR3 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | DDR3 |
Memory Bandwidth | 28.8GB/sec | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28.8GB/sec |
L2 Cache | 256 KB | vs | ![]() |
512 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 384 | ![]() | vs | 320 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 19% | ![]() | vs | 10% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 32 | ![]() | vs | 20 | |
Texture Rate | 33.6 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 14.6 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 16 | ![]() | vs | 8 | |
Pixel Rate | 16.8 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 5.8 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DVI Connections | 2 | ![]() | vs | 1 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 65 Watts | vs | ![]() | 30 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 350 Watts & 26 Amps | ![]() | vs | 400 Watts & 18 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | 4.4 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | no | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-3220 3.3GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | vs | ![]() | 4 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1366x768 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview GeForce GT 640 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition is a special edition of NVIDIA's Middle-Class GeForce GT 640, created by Gigabyte. Overclock: Central Unit The Central Unit now runs at 1050MHz, instead of 902MHz. Overclock: Memory Clock The Operating Memory Clock and the Frame Buffer remain the same. Cooling Solution The Cooling System remains the same. Performance Benchmarks indicate a 8% performance over the reference GeForce GT 640. | Note: This Graphics Card has 2 variants: one with DDR3 and another with GDDR5. This is the DDR3 Version. Radeon R7 240 2GB offers a core codenamed Oland PRO and thus features 320 Shader Processing Units, 20 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on a 128-bit bus width of standard DDR3. While the central unit runs at 730MHz and goes up to 780MHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 900MHz. With a rated board TDP of 30W, it requires no extra power connectors. Compared to Radeon R7 250, its performance is significantly lower (over 25% slower), especially at higher resolutions due to the limited memory bandwidth. Still, the TDP is relatively low and so this card may be used on low end systems and offer a reasonable upgrade, when compared to integrated graphics. |
---|