Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game HD i7 3840QM Mobility Radeon X1600
Cyberpunk 2077 1728% 4297%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 1572% 3921%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 1518% 3791%
FIFA 21 822% 2118%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 1518% 3791%
Watch Dogs Legion 1664% 4141%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 2521% 6204%
Grand Theft Auto VI 2473% 6087%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 1631% 4063%
Genshin Impact 1728% 4297%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel HD i7 3840QM are massively better than the AMD Mobility Radeon X1600.

The HD i7 3840QM was released over three years more recently than the Mobility Radeon X1600, and so the HD i7 3840QM is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Mobility Radeon X1600 when running the latest games.

The Mobility Radeon X1600 has 256 MB video memory, but the HD i7 3840QM does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The HD i7 3840QM has 16 Shader Processing Units and the Mobility Radeon X1600 has 5. However, the actual shader performance of the HD i7 3840QM is 83 and the actual shader performance of the Mobility Radeon X1600 is 1. The HD i7 3840QM having 82 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the HD i7 3840QM delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Mobility Radeon X1600.

The HD i7 3840QM requires 45 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Mobility Radeon X1600.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed650 MHzvs450 MHz
Boost Clock1300 MHzvs-
ArchitectureIvy Bridge GT2RV530
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support Good vs -
Release Date29 Apr 2012vs01 Feb 2006
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900 - green tick vs green tick -
green tick vs -
2560x1440 - green tick vs green tick -
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs256 MB
Memory Speed800 MHzvs470 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth12.8GB/secvs15GB/sec
L2 Cache 1024 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units16vs5
Actual Shader Performance4%vs0%
Texture Mapping Units4vs-
Texture Rate2.6 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units2vs-
Pixel Rate1.3 GPixel/svs-

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2048x1536
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power45 Watts-
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs3.0
Open GL4.0vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-3840QM 4-Core 2.8GHz-
Recommended RAM4 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewN/AATI’s Mobility Radeon X1600 drives visual velocity into performance thin notebook PCs, delivering high performance 3D graphics, enhanced video playback quality, and extended battery life. A 90-nanometer process and hyper-efficient 3D architecture deliver supercharged graphics performance, enhanced by ultra-threaded operations and a new Ring-Bus memory controller. Lightning-fast GDDR3 memory boosts gaming performance, and full Direct X® 9 Shader Model 3.0 support enables astonishing effects and brings 3D games and applications to new levels of realism. Enhanced with ATI’s revolutionary ATI Avivo™ video display technology, ATI Mobility Radeon™ X1600 transforms your notebook into a superior home theater-quality mobile entertainment system.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants