Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game HD i7 3840QM Quadro FX 1800M
Cyberpunk 2077 1728% 1638%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 1572% 1490%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 1518% 1438%
Watch Dogs Legion 1664% 1577%
FIFA 21 822% 777%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 1518% 1438%
Godfall 2869% 2723%
Grand Theft Auto VI 2473% 2346%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 2521% 2392%
Genshin Impact 1728% 1638%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro FX 1800M are marginally better than the Intel HD i7 3840QM.

The HD i7 3840QM was released over a year more recently than the Quadro FX 1800M, and so the HD i7 3840QM is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Quadro FX 1800M.

The Quadro FX 1800M has 1024 MB video memory, but the HD i7 3840QM does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The HD i7 3840QM has 16 Shader Processing Units and the Quadro FX 1800M has 72. However, the actual shader performance of the HD i7 3840QM is 83 and the actual shader performance of the Quadro FX 1800M is 40. The HD i7 3840QM having 43 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Quadro FX 1800M performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The HD i7 3840QM transistor size technology is 18 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Quadro FX 1800M. This means that the HD i7 3840QM is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Quadro FX 1800M. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the HD i7 3840QM should consume less power than the Quadro FX 1800M.

The HD i7 3840QM requires 45 Watts to run and the Quadro FX 1800M requires 45 Watts. The two GPUs require the same amount of wattage to run. As such, there is no need to worry about which will more significantly affect your yearly electricity bills.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed650 MHzvs560 MHz
Boost Clock1300 MHzvs-
ArchitectureIvy Bridge GT2GT215M
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support Good vs -
Release Date29 Apr 2012vs01 Feb 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900 - green tick vs green tick -
1920x1080
2.1
green tick vs -
2560x1440 - green tick vs green tick -
3840x2160
0.1
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs1024 MB
Memory Speed800 MHzvs1100 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth12.8GB/secvs70.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 1024 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units16vs72
Actual Shader Performance4%vs2%
Technology22nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units4vs-
Texture Rate2.6 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units2vs-
Pixel Rate1.3 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs-
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power45 Wattsvs45 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11.1vs10.1
Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL4.0vs3.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-3840QM 4-Core 2.8GHz-
Recommended RAM4 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewN/AQuadro FX 1800M is the preferred professional graphics solution for 15.6” mobile workstations. Featuring the NVIDIA® CUDA™ architecture, 30-bit color accuracy, and certified for the most demanding CAD and DCC professional applications, Quadro FX 1800M GPUs deliver a power efficient, phenomenal visual experience for users on the go.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-