Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R7 250X PowerColor 1GB Edition | GeForce GTX 460 PNY 1GB OC Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 319% | 227% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 283% | 199% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 270% | 189% |
Hitman 3 | 444% | 325% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 489% | 360% |
FIFA 21 | 111% | 65% |
Far Cry 6 | 506% | 373% |
Genshin Impact | 319% | 227% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 500% | 369% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 304% | 215% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 PNY 1GB OC Edition are noticeably better than the AMD Radeon R7 250X PowerColor 1GB Edition.
The R7 250X has a 235 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 460, but the GTX 460 has 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the R7 250X. As a result, the GTX 460 exhibits a 2.8 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R7 250X. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R7 250X has a 235 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 460, but the GTX 460 has 16 more Render Output Units than the R7 250X. As a result, the GTX 460 exhibits a 8.5 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the R7 250X. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R7 250X was released over three years more recently than the GTX 460, and so the R7 250X is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 460 when running the latest games.
The Radeon R7 250X PowerColor 1GB Edition and the GeForce GTX 460 PNY 1GB OC Edition have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.
The GTX 460 has 46.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R7 250X, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 460 is noticeably better than the R7 250X.
The Radeon R7 250X PowerColor 1GB Edition has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 460 PNY 1GB OC Edition has 336. However, the actual shader performance of the R7 250X is 544 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 460 is 514. The R7 250X having 30 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GTX 460 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.
The R7 250X transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 460. This means that the R7 250X is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 460.
The Radeon R7 250X PowerColor 1GB Edition requires 80 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce GTX 460 PNY 1GB OC Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the R7 250X and a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the GTX 460. The two GPUs have been recommended a PSU with the same amount of wattage. As such, there is no need to worry about which will more significantly affect your yearly electricity bills.
Core Speed | 1000 MHz | ![]() | vs | 765 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 Cape Verde XT | Fermi GF104-300-KB-A1 | |||
OC Potential | Fair |
![]() |
vs | Poor | |
Driver Support | Good |
![]() | vs | Poor | |
Release Date | 13 Feb 2014 | ![]() | vs | 01 Aug 2010 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 6.8
|
vs | ![]() |
7.5
|
|
1920x1080 | 5.2
|
vs | ![]() |
5.8
|
|
2560x1440 | 3.5
|
vs | ![]() |
3.8
|
|
3840x2160 | 2.3
|
![]() |
vs | - |
Memory | 1024 MB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1024 MB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1125 MHz | ![]() | vs | 925 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | vs | ![]() | 256 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 72GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 118.4GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
512 KB |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 640 | ![]() | vs | 336 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 26% | ![]() | vs | 25% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | 40nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 40 | vs | ![]() | 56 | |
Texture Rate | 40 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 42.8 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 16 | vs | ![]() | 32 | |
Pixel Rate | 16 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 24.5 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | 2560x1600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
DVI Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 80 Watts | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 450 Watts & 33 Amps | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 450 Watts & 38 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | vs | ![]() | 4.5 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Core i5-760 2.8GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1600x900 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1600x900 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview Radeon R7 250X PowerColor 1GB Edition is a special edition of AMD's Fast-Middle-Class Radeon R7 250X, created by PowerColor. Overclock: Central Unit The Central Unit now runs at 1000MHz, instead of 950MHz. Overclock: Memory Clock The Operating Memory Clock and the Frame Buffer remain the same. Cooling Solution The reference cooling system remains the same. Performance Benchmarks indicate a 3% performance over the reference Radeon R7 250X. | GeForce GTX 460 PNY 1GB OC Edition is a special edition of the high-end GeForce GTX 460. The biggest features are increases in the core-clock that went from 675MHz to 765MHz and from 900MHz to 925MHz, respectively. According to most benchmarks, the performance boost is around 8% when compared to the standard GeForce GTX 460. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - | - |