Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | GeForce GT 730 v2 Inno3D Low Profile 1GB Edition | Radeon R7 240 2GB |
Hitman 3 | 819% | 1053% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 606% | 786% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 546% | 711% |
Resident Evil 8 | 606% | 786% |
FIFA 21 | 256% | 347% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 894% | 1147% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 525% | 684% |
Genshin Impact | 606% | 786% |
Far Cry 6 | 922% | 1182% |
The Medium | 781% | 1006% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GT 730 v2 Inno3D Low Profile 1GB Edition are noticeably better than the AMD Radeon R7 240 2GB.
The GT 730 has a 172 MHz higher core clock speed than the R7 240, but the R7 240 has 4 more Texture Mapping Units than the GT 730. As a result, the R7 240 exhibits a 0.2 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GT 730. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GT 730 has a 172 MHz higher core clock speed than the R7 240 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GT 730 providing 1.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The GT 730 was released less than a year after the R7 240, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.
The R7 240 has 1024 MB more video memory than the GT 730, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the GT 730 has superior memory performance.
The GT 730 has 11.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R7 240, which means that the memory performance of the GT 730 is slightly better than the R7 240.
The GeForce GT 730 v2 Inno3D Low Profile 1GB Edition has 384 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R7 240 2GB has 320. However, the actual shader performance of the GT 730 is 346 and the actual shader performance of the R7 240 is 212. The GT 730 having 134 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GT 730 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R7 240.
The GeForce GT 730 v2 Inno3D Low Profile 1GB Edition requires 38 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 240 2GB requires 30 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GT 730 and a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 240. The GT 730 requires 8 Watts more than the R7 240 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GT 730 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the R7 240.
Core Speed | 902 MHz | ![]() | vs | 730 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | ![]() | 780 MHz | |
Architecture | Kepler GK208-301-A1 | GCN 1.1 Oland PRO | |||
OC Potential | Fair | vs |
![]() | Good | |
Driver Support | Good | vs | ![]() |
Great | |
Release Date | 18 Jun 2014 | ![]() | vs | 08 Oct 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | vs | ![]() |
6.4
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 5.1
|
![]() |
vs | 4.9
|
|
1920x1080 | 3.7
|
![]() |
vs | 3.1
|
|
2560x1440 | 2.5
|
![]() |
vs | 2.3
|
|
3840x2160 | 1.8
|
![]() |
vs | 1.5
|
Memory | 1024 MB | vs | ![]() | 2048 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1253 MHz | ![]() | vs | 900 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 64 Bit | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | DDR3 | |
Memory Bandwidth | 40.1GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 28.8GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 128 KB | vs | ![]() |
512 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 384 | ![]() | vs | 320 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 17% | ![]() | vs | 10% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 16 | vs | ![]() | 20 | |
Texture Rate | 14.4 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 14.6 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 8 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 |
Pixel Rate | 7.2 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 5.8 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DVI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 38 Watts | vs | ![]() | 30 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 300 Watts & 22 Amps | ![]() | vs | 400 Watts & 18 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | 4.4 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | vs | ![]() | 4 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1366x768 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview GeForce GT 730 v2 Inno3D Low Profile 1GB Edition is a special edition of NVIDIA's middle-class GeForce GT 730 v2, created by Inno3D. Overclock: Central Unit The Central Unit runs at the same speed. Overclock: Memory Clock The Operating Memory Clock and the Frame Buffer Remain the same. Cooling Solution The Cooling System remains the same. Performance Without any overclocking out of the box, GeForce GT 730 v2 Inno3D Low Profile 1GB Edition is as fast as the reference GeForce GT 730 v2. | Note: This Graphics Card has 2 variants: one with DDR3 and another with GDDR5. This is the DDR3 Version. Radeon R7 240 2GB offers a core codenamed Oland PRO and thus features 320 Shader Processing Units, 20 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on a 128-bit bus width of standard DDR3. While the central unit runs at 730MHz and goes up to 780MHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 900MHz. With a rated board TDP of 30W, it requires no extra power connectors. Compared to Radeon R7 250, its performance is significantly lower (over 25% slower), especially at higher resolutions due to the limited memory bandwidth. Still, the TDP is relatively low and so this card may be used on low end systems and offer a reasonable upgrade, when compared to integrated graphics. |
---|