Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 850M v2 2GB GeForce GTX 765M
Hitman 3 345% 374%
Cyberpunk 2077 242% 265%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 213% 233%
Resident Evil 8 242% 265%
FIFA 21 73% 84%
Grand Theft Auto VI 382% 413%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 203% 223%
Genshin Impact 242% 265%
Far Cry 6 395% 427%
The Medium 327% 355%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 850M v2 2GB are very slightly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M.

The GTX 850M has a 26 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 765M, but the GeForce GTX 765M has 24 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 850M. As a result, the GeForce GTX 765M exhibits a 19.4 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 850M. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 850M has a 26 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 765M and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 850M providing 0.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 850M was released less than a year after the GeForce GTX 765M, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The GeForce GTX 850M v2 2GB and the GeForce GTX 765M have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GTX 850M has 16.1 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GTX 765M, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 850M is slightly better than the GeForce GTX 765M.

The GeForce GTX 850M v2 2GB has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 765M has 768. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 850M is 809 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 765M is 653. The GTX 850M having 156 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 850M delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce GTX 765M.

The GeForce GTX 850M v2 2GB requires 45 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 765M requires 65 Watts. The GeForce GTX 765M requires 20 Watts more than the GTX 850M to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GeForce GTX 765M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GTX 850M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed876 MHzvs850 MHz
Boost Clock936 MHzvs-
ArchitectureMaxwell GM107Kepler GK106-N14E-GE-B-A1
OC Potential Fair vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date12 Mar 2014vs30 May 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
9.7
green tick vs
8.9
1600x900
7.5
green tick vs
7
1920x1080
5.7
green tick vs
5.5
2560x1440
3.6
vs green tick
3.7
3840x2160
2.4
green tick vs green tick
2.4

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1253 MHzvs1002 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth80.2GB/secvs64.1GB/sec
L2 Cache 2048 KB green tick vs 256 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units640vs768
Actual Shader Performance39%vs31%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units40vs64
Texture Rate35 GTexel/svs54.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs16
Pixel Rate14 GPixel/svs13.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power45 Wattsvs65 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-4700MQ 4-Core 2.4GHzvsIntel Core i7-3630QM 4-Core 2.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 850M v2 2GB is a Performance Mobile Graphics Card based on the first variant of the Maxwell architecture.

Architecture
The first variant of the Maxwell Architecture succeeds the Kepler Architecture. Despite being also manufactured with a 28nm technology, it has an extremely large L2 Cache which allows NVIDIA to produce Graphics Cards with relatively small memory data transfer rates, without causing too much impact on the overall performance. Furthermore, the Shaders have been redesigned and are both more powerful and energy efficient.

GPU
It equips a GPU codenamed GM107 which has 5 SM activated and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The memory clock operates at 1253MHz. The size of the frame buffer is adequate.

Features
DirectX 12 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for GameStream, G-SYNC, GPU Boost 2.0, GeForce Experience, PhysX and other technologies.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 45W, it may be equipped in average sized notebooks.

Performance
GeForce GTX 850M v2 2GB is considerably faster than GeForce GTX 850M 2GB, especially on higher resolutions, thanks to the fast GDDR5.
It thus offers decent gaming at 1920x1080 and most modern games should run fluently at high settings.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Strong Processor (Intel Core i7 Mobile) and 8GB of RAM for a notebook with GeForce GTX 850M v2 2GB.
Overview
GeForce GTX 760M is a Performance Mobile Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
The Kepler Architecture was NVIDIA's big step to power efficiency. Each Stream Multiprocessor (SMX) now hosts 192 Shader Processing Units - against the 48 of older Fermi Architecture, and has been redesigned being now clocked at the same speed of the Central Unit. This means they are more energy efficient and will consequently lead to cooler operating temperatures. However, it also means they are weaker. It can be said that one Fermi SMX is as fast as 2 Kepler SMXs.
Additionally, and not available in all GPUs, Kepler also introduced the Boost Clock Feature. The Boost Clock is an even higher Clock Speed activated when in gaming mode and becomes the effective speed of the GPU.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GK106-N14E-GE-B-A1 which has 4 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 64 TMUs and 16 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 850MHz.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 1002MHz.

Features
DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for SLI, Kepler Boost, Optimus, CUDA, OpenCL, DirectCompute, 3D Vision Surround, PhysX, Realtime Raytracing and other technologies

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 65W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Despite being underclocked, when compared to GeForce GTX 650 Ti, GeForce GTX 765M ends up performing better in most cases as fast since the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology allows an even higher Central Unit Speed, which most times exceeds the 950MHz.
Gaming benchmarks indicate its performance is on average with the desktop GeForce GTX 650 Ti.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Powerful Processor (Intel Core i7 Mobile) and 8GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 765M.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-