Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R7 350 (OEM) | Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 414% | 220% |
Hitman 3 | 568% | 316% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 370% | 192% |
Resident Evil 8 | 414% | 220% |
FIFA 21 | 159% | 61% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 623% | 350% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 355% | 183% |
Genshin Impact | 414% | 220% |
The Medium | 541% | 299% |
Far Cry 6 | 643% | 363% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition are significantly better than the AMD Radeon R7 350 (OEM).
The R7 260X has a 30 MHz higher core clock speed and 32 more Texture Mapping Units than the R7 350. This results in the R7 260X providing 33.7 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R7 260X has a 30 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Render Output Units than the R7 350. This results in the R7 260X providing 8.5 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R7 350 was released over a year more recently than the R7 260X, and so the R7 350 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the R7 260X.
The Radeon R7 350 (OEM) and the Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.
The R7 260X has 22.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R7 350, which means that the memory performance of the R7 260X is slightly better than the R7 350.
The Radeon R7 350 (OEM) has 384 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition has 896. However, the actual shader performance of the R7 350 is 343 and the actual shader performance of the R7 260X is 784. The R7 260X having 441 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R7 260X delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R7 350.
The Radeon R7 350 (OEM) requires 65 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition requires 105 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the R7 350 and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the R7 260X. The R7 260X requires 40 Watts more than the R7 350 to run. The difference is significant enough that the R7 260X may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R7 350.
Core Speed | 1000 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1030 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Architecture | GCN 1.1 Oland XT | GCN 1.1 Bonaire XT | |||
OC Potential | Poor | vs |
![]() | Fair | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | Good | |
Release Date | 05 May 2015 | ![]() | vs | 08 Oct 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 8.2
|
vs | ![]() |
9.9
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 6.2
|
vs | ![]() |
7.7
|
|
1920x1080 | 4.6
|
vs | ![]() |
5.9
|
|
2560x1440 | 3
|
vs | ![]() |
4.2
|
|
3840x2160 | 2.1
|
vs | ![]() |
2.5
|
Memory | 1024 MB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1024 MB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1150 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1500 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 73.6GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 96GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
512 KB |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 384 | vs | ![]() | 896 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 17% | vs | ![]() | 38% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 24 | vs | ![]() | 56 | |
Texture Rate | 24 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 57.7 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 8 | vs | ![]() | 16 | |
Pixel Rate | 8 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 16.5 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 2560x1600 | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
DVI Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
Comparison |
Max Power | 65 Watts | ![]() | vs | 105 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 450 Watts & 33 Amps | ![]() | vs | 500 Watts & 33 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4.4 |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-4460 3.2GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1600x900 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1600x900 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview Radeon R5 350 (OEM) is an OEM only, Middle-Class Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Graphics Core Next Architecture. Architecture The GCN 1.1 revision of the Graphics Core Next Architecture adds new important technologies and is largely oriented for energy efficiency. New technologies such as PowerTune and TrueAudio are the biggest additions as well as DirectX 11.2 support. GPU It equips a GPU codenamed Oland XT previously used on Radeon R5 250. It offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 24 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The central unit runs at 1000MHz and goes up to 1050MHz, in Turbo Mode. Memory The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 1125MHz. Features DirectX 12.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for Crossfire, Mantle, PowerTune, Eyefinity, ZeroCore, HD3D, App Acceleration and other technologies. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 65W, it requires at least a 450W PSU and relies entirely on the PCI slot for power. Performance Radeon R5 350 (OEM) is a direct rebrand of Radeon R7 250. Therefore, it offers exactly the same performance. System Suggestions We recommend a Strong Dual Core Processor (Intel Core i5 Quad Core/AMD FX Quad Core) and 8GB of RAM for a system with Radeon R5 350 (OEM). | Overview Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition is a Special Edition of AMD's Fast-Middle-Class Radeon R7 260X v2, created by PowerColor. Overclock: Central Unit The Central Unit has been increased from 1000MHz to 1030MHz. Overclock: Memory Clock None. Frame Buffer Untouched. Cooling Solution Untouched. Performance Benchmarks Indicate a 1% Performance Boost over the Reference Radeon R7 260X v2. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - | - |