Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 970 Zotac AMP! Extreme Core 4GB Edition SLI Radeon R9 280X Crossfire
Cyberpunk 2077 32% 5%
Hitman 3 12% 36%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 38% 4%
Resident Evil 8 32% 5%
FIFA 21 66% 47%
Grand Theft Auto VI 5% 47%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 40% 7%
Genshin Impact 32% 5%
The Medium 16% 31%
Far Cry 6 2% 52%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 Zotac AMP! Extreme Core 4GB Edition SLI are significantly better than the AMD Radeon R9 280X Crossfire.

The GTX 970 has a 378 MHz higher core clock speed but 48 fewer Texture Mapping Units than the R9 280X. The lower TMU count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the GTX 970 manages to provide 37.8 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 970 has a 378 MHz higher core clock speed and 48 more Render Output Units than the R9 280X. This results in the GTX 970 providing 83.1 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 970 was released less than a year after the R9 280X, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The GTX 970 has 2048 MB more video memory than the R9 280X, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 970 also has superior memory performance overall.

The R9 280X has 115.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 970, which means that the memory performance of the R9 280X is massively better than the GTX 970.

The GeForce GTX 970 Zotac AMP! Extreme Core 4GB Edition SLI has 3328 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R9 280X Crossfire has 4096. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 970 is 6200. The GTX 970 having 2104 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 970 delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R9 280X.

The Radeon R9 280X Crossfire requires 550 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GTX 970. We would recommend a PSU with at least 1000 Watts for the R9 280X, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the GTX 970.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1228 MHzvs850 MHz
Boost Clock1380 MHzvs1000 MHz
ArchitectureMaxwell GM204-200-A1 (x2)GCN 1.1 Tahiti XTL (x2)
OC Potential Poor vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs -
Release Date19 Sep 2014vs01 Oct 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900
10
green tick vs -
1920x1080
10
green tick vs green tick
10
2560x1440
9.9
green tick vs -
3840x2160
7.6
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory8192 MBvs6144 MB
Memory Speed1800 MHzvs1500 MHz
Memory Bus512 Bitvs768 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth460.8GB/secvs576GB/sec
L2 Cache 4096 KB green tick vs 1536 KB
Delta Color Compression yes vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units3328vs4096
Actual Shader Performance100%vs100%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units208vs256
Texture Rate255.4 GTexel/svs217.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units112vs64
Pixel Rate137.5 GPixel/svs54.4 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections1vs0
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-550 Watts
Recommended PSU-1000 Watts & 42 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.1vs11.2
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHzvsIntel Core i7-3770K 4-Core 3.5GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution2560x1440vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe SLI setup of GeForce GTX 970 Zotac AMP! Extreme Core 4GB Edition.Radeon R9 280X Crossfire is a solution of two Radeon R9 280X put together using AMD'S Crossfire technology.
Check the page of Radeon R9 280X to know more about its chip.
Crossfire relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is up to 60% better than a single Radeon R9 280X performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports crossfire or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single Radeon R9 280X. Expect this combination to draw up to 550 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower.
Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-