Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon HD 4830 HIS Fan 512MB Edition | Radeon R7 240 2GB |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 606% | 786% |
Hitman 3 | 819% | 1053% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 546% | 711% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 525% | 684% |
FIFA 21 | 256% | 347% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 894% | 1147% |
Far Cry 6 | 922% | 1182% |
Genshin Impact | 606% | 786% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 913% | 1171% |
Battlefield 6 | 819% | 1053% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 4830 HIS Fan 512MB Edition are noticeably better than the AMD Radeon R7 240 2GB.
The R7 240 has a 155 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 4830, but the HD 4830 has 12 more Texture Mapping Units than the R7 240. As a result, the HD 4830 exhibits a 3.8 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R7 240. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R7 240 has a 155 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 4830, but the HD 4830 has 8 more Render Output Units than the R7 240. As a result, the HD 4830 exhibits a 3.4 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the R7 240. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R7 240 was released over three years more recently than the HD 4830, and so the R7 240 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the HD 4830 when running the latest games.
The R7 240 has 1536 MB more video memory than the HD 4830, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the HD 4830 has superior memory performance.
The HD 4830 has 28.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R7 240, which means that the memory performance of the HD 4830 is slightly better than the R7 240.
The Radeon HD 4830 HIS Fan 512MB Edition has 640 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R7 240 2GB has 320. However, the actual shader performance of the HD 4830 is 258 and the actual shader performance of the R7 240 is 212. The HD 4830 having 46 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the HD 4830 delivers a noticeably smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R7 240.
The R7 240 transistor size technology is 27 nm (nanometers) smaller than the HD 4830. This means that the R7 240 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the HD 4830.
The Radeon HD 4830 HIS Fan 512MB Edition requires 95 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 240 2GB requires 30 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the HD 4830 and a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 240. The HD 4830 requires 65 Watts more than the R7 240 to run. The difference is significant enough that the HD 4830 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R7 240.
Core Speed | 575 MHz | vs | ![]() | 730 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | ![]() | 780 MHz | |
Architecture | R700 RV790 LE | GCN 1.1 Oland PRO | |||
OC Potential | Fair | vs |
![]() | Good | |
Driver Support | Poor | vs | ![]() |
Great | |
Release Date | 21 Oct 2008 | vs | ![]() | 08 Oct 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | vs | ![]() |
6.4
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 5.1
|
![]() |
vs | 4.9
|
|
1920x1080 | 3.7
|
![]() |
vs | 3.1
|
|
2560x1440 | 2.5
|
![]() |
vs | 2.3
|
|
3840x2160 | 1.7
|
![]() |
vs | 1.5
|
Memory | 512 MB | vs | ![]() | 2048 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 900 MHz | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 900 MHz |
Memory Bus | 256 Bit | ![]() | vs | 128 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR3 | ![]() | vs | DDR3 | |
Memory Bandwidth | 57.6GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 28.8GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 0 KB | vs | ![]() |
512 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 640 | ![]() | vs | 320 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 12% | ![]() | vs | 10% | |
Technology | 55nm | vs | ![]() | 28nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 32 | ![]() | vs | 20 | |
Texture Rate | 18.4 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 14.6 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 16 | ![]() | vs | 8 | |
Pixel Rate | 9.2 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 5.8 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 2560x1600 | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DVI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 95 Watts | vs | ![]() | 30 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 450 Watts & 33 Amps | vs | ![]() | 400 Watts & 18 Amps |
DirectX | 10.1 | vs | ![]() | 12.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 4.1 | vs | ![]() | 5.0 | |
Open GL | 3.3 | vs | ![]() | 4.4 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | no | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3.0GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 4 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1600x900 | ![]() | vs | 1366x768 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview Radeon HD 4830 HIS Fan 512MB Edition is a special edition of AMD's Performance Radeon HD 4830, created by HIS. Overclock: Central Unit The Central Unit runs at the same speed. Overclock: Memory Clock The Operating Memory Clock and the Frame Buffer remain the same. Cooling Solution The Cooling System consists of HIS' Fan which is Faster, Cooler and Quieter. Performance Without Overclocking Out of The Box, Radeon HD 4830 HIS Fan 512MB Edition is as fast as the reference Radeon HD 4830. | Note: This Graphics Card has 2 variants: one with DDR3 and another with GDDR5. This is the DDR3 Version. Radeon R7 240 2GB offers a core codenamed Oland PRO and thus features 320 Shader Processing Units, 20 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on a 128-bit bus width of standard DDR3. While the central unit runs at 730MHz and goes up to 780MHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 900MHz. With a rated board TDP of 30W, it requires no extra power connectors. Compared to Radeon R7 250, its performance is significantly lower (over 25% slower), especially at higher resolutions due to the limited memory bandwidth. Still, the TDP is relatively low and so this card may be used on low end systems and offer a reasonable upgrade, when compared to integrated graphics. |
---|