Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon HD 7950 Boost Edition Crossfire | GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition |
Hitman 3 | 55% | 90% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 19% | 46% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 9% | 34% |
Resident Evil 8 | 19% | 46% |
FIFA 21 | 40% | 26% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 67% | 105% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 5% | 29% |
Genshin Impact | 19% | 46% |
Far Cry 6 | 72% | 111% |
The Medium | 48% | 82% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost Edition Crossfire are noticeably better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition.
The GTX 680 has a 260 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 7950, but the HD 7950 has 96 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 680. As a result, the HD 7950 exhibits a 48.3 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 680. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GTX 680 has a 260 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 7950, but the HD 7950 has 32 more Render Output Units than the GTX 680. As a result, the HD 7950 exhibits a 18.9 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 680. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The HD 7950 was released less than a year after the GTX 680, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The HD 7950 has 2048 MB more video memory than the GTX 680, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the HD 7950 also has superior memory performance overall.
The HD 7950 has 287.7 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 680, which means that the memory performance of the HD 7950 is massively better than the GTX 680.
The Radeon HD 7950 Boost Edition Crossfire has 3584 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition has 1536. However, the actual shader performance of the HD 7950 is 2818 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 680 is 1806. The HD 7950 having 1012 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the HD 7950 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 680.
The GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition requires 195 Watts to run but there is no entry for the HD 7950. We would recommend a PSU with at least 550 Watts for the GTX 680, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the HD 7950.
Core Speed | 850 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1110 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1176 MHz | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 Tahiti PRO2 (x2) | Kepler GK104-400-A2 | |||
OC Potential | Fair | vs |
![]() | Good | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | Good | |
Release Date | 01 Aug 2012 | ![]() | vs | 01 May 2012 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | - | vs | ![]() |
10
|
|
1920x1080 | 9.6
|
![]() |
vs | 8.8
|
|
2560x1440 | - | vs | ![]() |
6.4
|
|
3840x2160 | - | vs | ![]() |
4.7
|
Memory | 6144 MB | ![]() | vs | 4096 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1250 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1502 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 768 Bit | ![]() | vs | 256 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 480GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 192.3GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 1536 KB | ![]() |
vs | 512 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 3584 | ![]() | vs | 1536 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 100% | ![]() | vs | 87% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 224 | ![]() | vs | 128 | |
Texture Rate | 190.4 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 142.1 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 64 | ![]() | vs | 32 | |
Pixel Rate | 54.4 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 35.5 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | - | 195 Watts | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | - | 550 Watts & 42 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | vs | ![]() | 4.5 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i7-3770K 4-Core 3.5GHz | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K 4-Core 3.5GHz | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 12 GB | vs | ![]() | 8 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 2560x1600 | ![]() | vs | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | The Crossfire setup of Radeon HD 7950 Boost Edition. | GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition is a Special Edition of the powerful GeForce GTX 680. See the standard version for more information about it. Compared to the standard version, GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition features an increased core-clock that went from 1006MHz to 1110MHz and the turbo boost from 1100MHz to 1176MHz. The amount of memory was also increased from 2GB to 4GB, proving useful if gaming at high resolutions and using many image improving techniques, though we consider this excessive. Expect a 9% performance boost when compared to the standard card. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - | - |