Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon Xpress 1150 Radeon Xpress 1200 Series
Red Dead Redemption 2 21300% 35567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21300% 35567%
Cyberpunk 2077 29300% 48900%
Fortnite: Chapter 2 9700% 16233%
FIFA 20 11300% 18900%
The Outer Worlds 17700% 29567%
Borderlands 3 22500% 37567%
Need For Speed Heat 21300% 35567%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 29300% 48900%
Zombieland: Double Tap - Road Trip 19900% 33233%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon Xpress 1150 are significantly better than the AMD Radeon Xpress 1200 Series.

The Xpress 1200 was released less than a year after the Radeon Xpress 1150, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon Xpress 1150 and the Radeon Xpress 1200 Series have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Radeon Xpress 1150 has 3.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Xpress 1200, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon Xpress 1150 is marginally better than the Xpress 1200.

The Radeon Xpress 1150 has 2 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon Xpress 1200 Series has 4. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon Xpress 1150 is 0 and the actual shader performance of the Xpress 1200 is 1. The Xpress 1200 having 1 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Radeon Xpress 1150 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

GPU Architecture

Core Speed400 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
OC Potential None vs Poor
Driver Support Discontinued vs -
Release Date01 Jun 2006vs28 Feb 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

green tick vs -
green tick vs -
1920x1080 - green tick vs green tick -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory Speed400 MHzvs-
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth3.2GB/secvs-
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs4
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Texture Mapping Units2vs-
Texture Rate0.8 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units2vs-
Pixel Rate0.8 GPixel/svs-

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2048x1536vs2048x1536
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

Shader Model3.0vs3.0
Open GL2.0vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Celeron D 310-
Recommended RAM2 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution800x600-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewVery Old Discontinued Graphics Card. Even Windows can be considered unplayable.ATI's 'R520' core (codenamed Fudo) is the foundation for a line of DirectX 9.0c and OpenGL 2.0 3D accelerator X1000 video cards. It is ATI's first major architectural overhaul since the 'R300' core and is highly optimized for Shader Model 3.0. The Radeon X1000 series using the core was introduced on October 5, 2005, and competed primarily against nVidia's GeForce 7000 series. ATI released the successor to the R500 series with the R600 series on May 14, 2007. ATI does not provide official support for any X1000 series cards for Windows 7
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants