Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | HD i7 2700K | GeForce 8600 GT 512MB GDDR3 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2725% | 1514% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 2484% | 1376% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 2400% | 1329% |
Hitman 3 | 3575% | 2000% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 3875% | 2171% |
FIFA 21 | 1325% | 714% |
Far Cry 6 | 3988% | 2236% |
Genshin Impact | 2725% | 1514% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 3950% | 2214% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 2625% | 1457% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT 512MB GDDR3 are significantly better than the Intel HD i7 2700K.
The HD i7 2700K has a 310 MHz higher core clock speed than the 8600 GT, but the 8600 GT has 14 more Texture Mapping Units than the HD i7 2700K. As a result, the 8600 GT exhibits a 6.9 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the HD i7 2700K. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The HD i7 2700K has a 310 MHz higher core clock speed than the 8600 GT, but the 8600 GT has 6 more Render Output Units than the HD i7 2700K. As a result, the 8600 GT exhibits a 2.6 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the HD i7 2700K. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The HD i7 2700K was released over three years more recently than the 8600 GT, and so the HD i7 2700K is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the 8600 GT when running the latest games.
The 8600 GT has 512 MB video memory, but the HD i7 2700K does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.
The HD i7 2700K has 12 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 8600 GT 512MB GDDR3 has 32. However, the actual shader performance of the HD i7 2700K is 65 and the actual shader performance of the 8600 GT is 43. The HD i7 2700K having 22 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the 8600 GT performs better when taking into account other relevant data.
The HD i7 2700K transistor size technology is 48 nm (nanometers) smaller than the 8600 GT. This means that the HD i7 2700K is expected to run much cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the 8600 GT.
The HD i7 2700K requires 95 Watts to run and the GeForce 8600 GT 512MB GDDR3 requires 46 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the HD i7 2700K and a PSU with at least 350 Watts for the 8600 GT. The HD i7 2700K requires 49 Watts more than the 8600 GT to run. The difference is significant enough that the HD i7 2700K may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the 8600 GT.
Core Speed | 850 MHz | ![]() | vs | 540 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Architecture | Sandy Bridge GT2 | Tesla G84 | |||
OC Potential | - | vs |
![]() | Poor | |
Driver Support | Poor | vs | Poor | ||
Release Date | 23 Oct 2011 | ![]() | vs | 01 Apr 2007 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 2.4
|
vs | ![]() |
3.1
|
|
1920x1080 | 1.6
|
vs | ![]() |
2.2
|
|
2560x1440 | 1.2
|
vs | ![]() |
1.4
|
|
3840x2160 | 0.7
|
vs | ![]() |
0.9
|
Memory | N/A | vs | ![]() | 512 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 667 MHz | vs | ![]() | 700 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit |
Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | ![]() | GDDR3 | |
Memory Bandwidth | 21.3GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 22.4GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 1024 KB | ![]() |
vs | 0 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 12 | vs | ![]() | 32 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 3% | ![]() | vs | 2% | |
Technology | 32nm | ![]() | vs | 80nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 2 | vs | ![]() | 16 | |
Texture Rate | 1.7 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 8.6 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 2 | vs | ![]() | 8 | |
Pixel Rate | 1.7 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 4.3 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 2560x1600 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2560x1600 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 95 Watts | vs | ![]() | 46 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 300 Watts & 22 Amps | ![]() | vs | 350 Watts & 24 Amps |
DirectX | 10.1 | ![]() | vs | 10.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 4.1 | ![]() | vs | 4.0 | |
Open GL | 3.1 | vs | ![]() | 3.3 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | - | Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 2.4GHz | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 4 GB | vs | ![]() | 3 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1024x768 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1024x768 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview Intel HD i7 2700K is the specific version of Intel HD Graphics 3000 Desktop that is Integrated in the Core i7-2700K Processor. GPU The Central Unit Initially Runs at 850MHz and goes up to 1350MHz, in Turbo Mode. Memory Frame Buffer: Up to 1.7GB. Memory Channel: 64-bit Or 128-bit. Memory Clock: Up to 667MHz. Memory Bandwidth: It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system. Performance Gaming Benchmarks Indicate its Performance is Similar to of a Dedicated GeForce GT 610. System Suggestions We recommend 4GB of RAM for a system with Intel HD i7 2700K. | GeForce 8600 GT 512MB GDDR3 is one of the many variants of the fast-middle-class GeForce 8600 GT. On this version, the GPU is equipped with 512MB of standard GDDR3. The architecture allows the use of 512MB, since the GPU's processing power is strong enough and the memory controller is up for the task of processing 512MB. Therefore, the performance is superior to the 256MB version and any other version of DDR2, including 1GB. However, and due to its architecture limitations, modern demanding games will require reduced settings, even if they don't require more than 512MB of video ram. Very Demanding games like Metro 2033 are only playable at the lowest settings. |
---|
Recommended CPU | - | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | N/A | N/A | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |