0
Check Prices $129.00
3.1
Check Prices $299.00
Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R7 360X GeForce GTX 960 Ti 2GB
Cyberpunk 2077 183% 41%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 158% 29%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 150% 25%
FIFA 21 43% 29%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 150% 25%
Watch Dogs Legion 173% 36%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 305% 103%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 168% 34%
Grand Theft Auto VI 298% 99%
Genshin Impact 183% 41%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 Ti 2GB are significantly better than the AMD Radeon R7 360X.

The Radeon R7 360X has a 50 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 960 Ti, but the GTX 960 Ti has 40 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon R7 360X. As a result, the GTX 960 Ti exhibits a 39.2 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the Radeon R7 360X. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon R7 360X has a 50 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 960 Ti, but the GTX 960 Ti has 48 more Render Output Units than the Radeon R7 360X. As a result, the GTX 960 Ti exhibits a 49.6 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the Radeon R7 360X. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 960 Ti was released less than a year after the Radeon R7 360X, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The Radeon R7 360X and the GeForce GTX 960 Ti 2GB have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GTX 960 Ti has 120.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon R7 360X, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 960 Ti is massively better than the Radeon R7 360X.

The Radeon R7 360X has 896 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 960 Ti 2GB has 1536. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon R7 360X is 876 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 960 Ti is 1809. The GTX 960 Ti having 933 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 960 Ti delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Radeon R7 360X.

The Radeon R7 360X requires 120 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 960 Ti 2GB requires 140 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the Radeon R7 360X and a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the GTX 960 Ti. The GTX 960 Ti requires 20 Watts more than the Radeon R7 360X to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GTX 960 Ti to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Radeon R7 360X.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1100 MHzvs1050 MHz
Boost Clock1150 MHzvs1178 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Tobago XTMaxwell GM204-200-KD
OC Potential None vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs -
Release Date30 Oct 2015vs31 Oct 2015
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
8.2
green tick vs -
1920x1080
6.3
vs green tick
8.9
2560x1440
4.5
green tick vs -
3840x2160
2.7
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1625 MHzvs1753 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth104GB/secvs224.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB vs green tick 2048 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units896vs1536
Actual Shader Performance42%vs87%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs96
Texture Rate61.6 GTexel/svs100.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs64
Pixel Rate17.6 GPixel/svs67.2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections1vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs0
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power120 Wattsvs140 Watts
Recommended PSU500 Watts & 33 Ampsvs450 Watts & 33 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4370 3.8GHzvsIntel Core i5-4690K 3.5GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R7 360X is a Fast-Middle-Class Graphics Card based on the Second Revision of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture.

Architecture
The GCN 1.2 revision of the Graphics Core Next Architecture improves memory bandwidth performance which allows AMD to produce Graphics Cards with smaller data transfer rates without causing too much impact on the overall performance. This is done by using lossless delta color compression.
GCN 1.2 also adds improved Tesselation and video encoding/decoding performance as well as DirectX 12.0 Support.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Tobago XT which has 16 Compute Units activated and thus offers 896 Shader Processing Units, 56 TMUs and 16 ROPs. The Central Unit is initially clocked at 1100MHz and goes up to 1150MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is adequate. The Memory Clock Operates at 1625MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 120W, it requires at least a 500W PSU with one available 6-pin connector.

Performance
Product Not Released. Performance Not Known Yet.

System Suggestions
Radeon R7 360X 2GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Decent Processor (Intel Core i3 Dual Core/AMD FX Quad Core) and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Overview
GeForce GTX 960 Ti 2GB is an upcoming high-end Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Maxwell architecture.

Architecture
The first variant of the Maxwell Architecture succeeds the Kepler Architecture. Despite being also manufactured with a 28nm technology, it has an extremely large L2 Cache which allows NVIDIA to produce Graphics Cards with relatively small memory data transfer rates, without causing too much impact on the overall performance. Furthermore, the Shaders have been redesigned and are both more powerful and energy efficient.

GPU
It equips a GPU codenamed GM204-200-KD which has 12 SM activated and thus offers 1536 Shader Processing Units, 96 TMUs and 64 ROPs. The central unit runs at ????MHz and goes up to ????MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 256-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is adequate. The Memory Clock Operates at 1753MHz.

Features
DirectX 12.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for SLI, GameStream, G-SYNC, GPU Boost 2.0, GeForce Experience, PhysX and other technologies.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 140W, it requires at least a 450W PSU with one available 6-pin connector.

Performance
Coming Soon!

System Suggestions
We recommend a very strong processor (Intel Core i5 Quad Core/AMD FX Eight Core) and 8GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 960 Ti 2GB.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-