Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R7 360X Radeon R7 340 (OEM)
Cyberpunk 2077 183% 495%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 158% 444%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 150% 426%
FIFA 21 43% 200%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 150% 426%
Watch Dogs Legion 173% 474%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 305% 753%
Grand Theft Auto VI 298% 737%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 168% 463%
Genshin Impact 183% 495%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 360X are massively better than the AMD Radeon R7 340 (OEM).

The Radeon R7 360X has a 370 MHz higher core clock speed and 32 more Texture Mapping Units than the R7 340. This results in the Radeon R7 360X providing 44.1 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon R7 360X has a 370 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Render Output Units than the R7 340. This results in the Radeon R7 360X providing 11.8 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon R7 360X was released less than a year after the R7 340, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The Radeon R7 360X and the Radeon R7 340 (OEM) have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Radeon R7 360X has 75.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R7 340, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon R7 360X is much better than the R7 340.

The Radeon R7 360X has 896 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R7 340 (OEM) has 384. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon R7 360X is 876 and the actual shader performance of the R7 340 is 255. The Radeon R7 360X having 621 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Radeon R7 360X delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R7 340.

The Radeon R7 360X requires 120 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 340 (OEM) requires 50 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the Radeon R7 360X and a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the R7 340. The Radeon R7 360X requires 70 Watts more than the R7 340 to run. The difference is significant enough that the Radeon R7 360X may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R7 340.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1100 MHzvs730 MHz
Boost Clock1150 MHzvs780 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Tobago XTGCN 1.1 Oland XT
OC Potential None vs Good
Driver Support Great vs Great
Release Date30 Oct 2015vs05 May 2015
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs
7
1600x900
8.2
green tick vs
5.4
1920x1080
6.3
green tick vs
4.2
2560x1440
4.5
green tick vs
2.8
3840x2160
2.7
green tick vs
1.9

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1625 MHzvs900 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth104GB/secvs28.8GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units896vs384
Actual Shader Performance42%vs12%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs24
Texture Rate61.6 GTexel/svs17.5 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs8
Pixel Rate17.6 GPixel/svs5.8 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections1vs1
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power120 Wattsvs50 Watts
Recommended PSU500 Watts & 33 Ampsvs450 Watts & 33 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4370 3.8GHzvsIntel Core i5-4460 3.2GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1366x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R7 360X is a Fast-Middle-Class Graphics Card based on the Second Revision of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture.

Architecture
The GCN 1.2 revision of the Graphics Core Next Architecture improves memory bandwidth performance which allows AMD to produce Graphics Cards with smaller data transfer rates without causing too much impact on the overall performance. This is done by using lossless delta color compression.
GCN 1.2 also adds improved Tesselation and video encoding/decoding performance as well as DirectX 12.0 Support.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Tobago XT which has 16 Compute Units activated and thus offers 896 Shader Processing Units, 56 TMUs and 16 ROPs. The Central Unit is initially clocked at 1100MHz and goes up to 1150MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is adequate. The Memory Clock Operates at 1625MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 120W, it requires at least a 500W PSU with one available 6-pin connector.

Performance
Product Not Released. Performance Not Known Yet.

System Suggestions
Radeon R7 360X 2GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Decent Processor (Intel Core i3 Dual Core/AMD FX Quad Core) and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Overview
Radeon R5 340 (OEM) is an OEM only, Middle-Class Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Graphics Core Next Architecture.

Architecture
The GCN 1.1 revision of the Graphics Core Next Architecture adds new important technologies and is largely oriented for energy efficiency. New technologies such as PowerTune and TrueAudio are the biggest additions as well as DirectX 11.2 support.

GPU
It equips a GPU codenamed Oland XT previously used on Radeon R5 250. It offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 24 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The central unit runs at 730MHz and goes up to 780MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 900MHz.

Features
DirectX 12.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for Crossfire, Mantle, PowerTune, Eyefinity, ZeroCore, HD3D, App Acceleration and other technologies.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 50W, it requires at least a 450W PSU and relies entirely on the PCI slot for power.

Performance
Radeon R5 340 (OEM) is a direct rebrand of the fastest Radeon R7 240 Variant, which was never used by any manufacturer. Therefore, it offers exactly the same performance.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Strong Dual Core Processor (Intel Core i5 Quad Core/AMD FX Quad Core) and 8GB of RAM for a system with Radeon R5 350 (OEM).
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-