0
Check Prices $129.00
8.3
Check Prices $649.00
Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R7 360X Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB
Cyberpunk 2077 183% 8%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 158% 16%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 150% 19%
FIFA 21 43% 54%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 150% 19%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 305% 31%
Watch Dogs Legion 173% 12%
Immortals: Fenyx Rising 130% 25%
Grand Theft Auto VI 298% 29%
Genshin Impact 183% 8%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB are massively better than the AMD Radeon R7 360X.

The Radeon R7 360X has a 50 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 FURY, but the R9 FURY has 200 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon R7 360X. As a result, the R9 FURY exhibits a 207.2 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the Radeon R7 360X. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon R7 360X has a 50 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 FURY, but the R9 FURY has 48 more Render Output Units than the Radeon R7 360X. As a result, the R9 FURY exhibits a 49.6 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the Radeon R7 360X. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon R7 360X was released less than a year after the R9 FURY, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The R9 FURY has 2048 MB more video memory than the Radeon R7 360X, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 FURY also has superior memory performance overall.

The R9 FURY has 408 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon R7 360X, which means that the memory performance of the R9 FURY is massively better than the Radeon R7 360X.

The Radeon R7 360X has 896 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB has 4096. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon R7 360X is 876 and the actual shader performance of the R9 FURY is 3656. The R9 FURY having 2780 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 FURY delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Radeon R7 360X.

The Radeon R7 360X requires 120 Watts to run and the Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB requires 275 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the Radeon R7 360X and a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the R9 FURY. The R9 FURY requires 155 Watts more than the Radeon R7 360X to run. The difference is significant enough that the R9 FURY may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the Radeon R7 360X.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1100 MHzvs1050 MHz
Boost Clock1150 MHzvs-
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Tobago XTGCN 1.2 Fiji XT
OC Potential None vs Poor
Driver Support Great vs Great
Release Date30 Oct 2015vs24 Jun 2015
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1600x900
8.2
vs green tick
10
1920x1080
6.3
vs green tick
10
2560x1440
4.5
vs green tick
8.4
3840x2160
2.7
vs green tick
6.5

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed1625 MHzvs500 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs4096 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsHBM-1
Memory Bandwidth104GB/secvs512GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB vs green tick 2048 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs yes
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units896vs4096
Actual Shader Performance42%vs100%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs256
Texture Rate61.6 GTexel/svs268.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs64
Pixel Rate17.6 GPixel/svs67.2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections1vs0
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs4
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power120 Wattsvs275 Watts
Recommended PSU500 Watts & 33 Ampsvs600 Watts & 42 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4370 3.8GHzvsIntel Core i7-4790K 4-Core 4.0GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs16 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs2560x1600

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R7 360X is a Fast-Middle-Class Graphics Card based on the Second Revision of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture.

Architecture
The GCN 1.2 revision of the Graphics Core Next Architecture improves memory bandwidth performance which allows AMD to produce Graphics Cards with smaller data transfer rates without causing too much impact on the overall performance. This is done by using lossless delta color compression.
GCN 1.2 also adds improved Tesselation and video encoding/decoding performance as well as DirectX 12.0 Support.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Tobago XT which has 16 Compute Units activated and thus offers 896 Shader Processing Units, 56 TMUs and 16 ROPs. The Central Unit is initially clocked at 1100MHz and goes up to 1150MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is adequate. The Memory Clock Operates at 1625MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 120W, it requires at least a 500W PSU with one available 6-pin connector.

Performance
Product Not Released. Performance Not Known Yet.

System Suggestions
Radeon R7 360X 2GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Decent Processor (Intel Core i3 Dual Core/AMD FX Quad Core) and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Overview
Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB is an Enthusiast Graphics Card based on the Third Revision of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture.

Architecture
The Fiji is a Second Generation GCN GPU. It offers support for HBM-1 Memory, DirectX 12.0, Open GL 4.5 and the acclaimed Delta Compression Algorithm which may decrease bandwidth consumption by up to 30%, in most games.
Fiji XT is the Full Variant of the GPU with 64 Compute Units activated, offering 4096 Shader Processing Units, 256 TMUs and 64 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit is clocked at 1000MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with stacked HBM-1 Memory and accesses the Frame Buffer through a 4096-bit memory interface.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However, and because the GPU itself is aimed for 4K Gaming, 4GB might be a bottlenecked and Performance could be better, were the Frame Buffer larger.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 275W, it requires at least a 600W PSU with two available 8-pin connectors.

Performance
Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB competes with GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB and both are available for $649.
Benchmarks However Indicate that GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB is still faster than Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB, even at 4K, whereas as the resolution goes down, the performance gap between the latter and GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB increases and at 1600x900, Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB is only as fast as the weaker GeForce GTX 980.
Considering Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB offers practically no overclock potential (operating memory clock can't even be increased), consumes slightly more energy than GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB, costs the same price and performs worse, Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB ends up being one of AMD's worst releases of the last years and given the hype built, probably the most disappointing.

System Suggestions
Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 2560x1600. We recommend a Very Strong Processor and 16GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-