Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | GeForce GT 730 v3 Asus 2GB Edition | Radeon R7 240 2GB |
Hitman 3 | 1533% | 1053% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1156% | 786% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 1048% | 711% |
Resident Evil 8 | 1156% | 786% |
FIFA 21 | 533% | 347% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 1667% | 1147% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 1011% | 684% |
Genshin Impact | 1156% | 786% |
Far Cry 6 | 1717% | 1182% |
The Medium | 1467% | 1006% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 240 2GB are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GT 730 v3 Asus 2GB Edition.
The R7 240 has a 30 MHz higher core clock speed and 4 more Texture Mapping Units than the GT 730. This results in the R7 240 providing 3.4 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R7 240 has a 30 MHz higher core clock speed and 4 more Render Output Units than the GT 730. This results in the R7 240 providing 3 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The GT 730 was released less than a year after the R7 240, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.
The GeForce GT 730 v3 Asus 2GB Edition and the Radeon R7 240 2GB have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.
The memory bandwidth of the GeForce GT 730 v3 Asus 2GB Edition and the Radeon R7 240 2GB are the same, which means the GT 730 and the R7 240 have equal limitations when it comes to graphical data transfer.
The GeForce GT 730 v3 Asus 2GB Edition has 96 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R7 240 2GB has 320. However, the actual shader performance of the GT 730 is 134 and the actual shader performance of the R7 240 is 212. The R7 240 having 78 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R7 240 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GT 730.
The R7 240 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GT 730. This means that the R7 240 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GT 730.
The GeForce GT 730 v3 Asus 2GB Edition requires 75 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 240 2GB requires 30 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GT 730 and a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 240. The GT 730 requires 45 Watts more than the R7 240 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GT 730 may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R7 240.
Core Speed | 700 MHz | vs | ![]() | 730 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | ![]() | 780 MHz | |
Architecture | Fermi GF108-400-A1 | GCN 1.1 Oland PRO | |||
OC Potential | Good |
![]() |
vs |
![]() | Good |
Driver Support | Poor | vs | ![]() |
Great | |
Release Date | 18 Jun 2014 | ![]() | vs | 08 Oct 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 5.3
|
vs | ![]() |
6.4
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 3.8
|
vs | ![]() |
4.9
|
|
1920x1080 | 2.5
|
vs | ![]() |
3.1
|
|
2560x1440 | 1.9
|
vs | ![]() |
2.3
|
|
3840x2160 | - | vs | ![]() |
1.5
|
Memory | 2048 MB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2048 MB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 900 MHz | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 900 MHz |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit |
Memory Type | DDR3 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | DDR3 |
Memory Bandwidth | 28.8GB/sec | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28.8GB/sec |
L2 Cache | 256 KB | vs | ![]() |
512 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 96 | vs | ![]() | 320 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 6% | vs | ![]() | 10% | |
Technology | 40nm | vs | ![]() | 28nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 16 | vs | ![]() | 20 | |
Texture Rate | 11.2 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 14.6 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 4 | vs | ![]() | 8 | |
Pixel Rate | 2.8 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 5.8 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DVI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 75 Watts | vs | ![]() | 30 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 300 Watts & 20 Amps | ![]() | vs | 400 Watts & 18 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | 4.4 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Pentium G3220 3.0GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 4 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1366x768 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview GeForce GT 730 v3 Asus 2GB Edition is a Special Edition of NVIDIA's Middle-Class GeForce GT 730 v3, created by Asus. Overclock: Central Unit None. Overclock: Memory Clock None. Frame Buffer Untouched. Cooling Solution Dust-Proof Fan: Unique fan design dissipates heat efficiently while extending a graphic card’s lifespan by 25% through increased dust and particle resistance. Performance Benchmarks Indicate no Performance Boost over the Reference GeForce GT 730 v3. | Note: This Graphics Card has 2 variants: one with DDR3 and another with GDDR5. This is the DDR3 Version. Radeon R7 240 2GB offers a core codenamed Oland PRO and thus features 320 Shader Processing Units, 20 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on a 128-bit bus width of standard DDR3. While the central unit runs at 730MHz and goes up to 780MHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 900MHz. With a rated board TDP of 30W, it requires no extra power connectors. Compared to Radeon R7 250, its performance is significantly lower (over 25% slower), especially at higher resolutions due to the limited memory bandwidth. Still, the TDP is relatively low and so this card may be used on low end systems and offer a reasonable upgrade, when compared to integrated graphics. |
---|