Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 560 Sparkle Calibe DF 1GB Edition GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition
Cyberpunk 2077 186% 46%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 161% 34%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 153% 29%
Hitman 3 272% 90%
Grand Theft Auto VI 302% 105%
FIFA 21 44% 26%
Far Cry 6 313% 111%
Genshin Impact 186% 46%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 310% 109%
Watch Dogs Legion 176% 41%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Sparkle Calibe DF 1GB Edition.

The GTX 680 has a 178 MHz higher core clock speed and 72 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 560. This results in the GTX 680 providing 89.9 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 680 has a 178 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 560 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 680 providing 5.7 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 680 was released less than a year after the GTX 560, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The GTX 680 has 3072 MB more video memory than the GTX 560, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 680 also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 680 has 48.7 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 560, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 680 is noticeably better than the GTX 560.

The GeForce GTX 560 Sparkle Calibe DF 1GB Edition has 336 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition has 1536. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 560 is 626 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 680 is 1806. The GTX 680 having 1180 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 680 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 560.

The GTX 680 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 560. This means that the GTX 680 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 560.

The GeForce GTX 560 Sparkle Calibe DF 1GB Edition requires 150 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition requires 195 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the GTX 560 and a PSU with at least 550 Watts for the GTX 680. The GTX 680 requires 45 Watts more than the GTX 560 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 680 may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 560.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed932 MHzvs1110 MHz
Boost Clock-vs1176 MHz
ArchitectureFermi GF114-325-A1Kepler GK104-400-A2
OC Potential Poor vs Good
Driver Support Poor vs Good
Release Date19 May 2011vs01 May 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
8.1
vs green tick
10
1920x1080
6.2
vs green tick
8.8
2560x1440
4.2
vs green tick
6.4
3840x2160 - vs green tick
4.7

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed1122 MHzvs1502 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth143.6GB/secvs192.3GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units336vs1536
Actual Shader Performance30%vs87%
Technology40nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs128
Texture Rate52.2 GTexel/svs142.1 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs32
Pixel Rate29.8 GPixel/svs35.5 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power150 Wattsvs195 Watts
Recommended PSU450 Watts & 30 Ampsvs550 Watts & 42 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-2300 2.8GHzvsIntel Core i7-3770K 4-Core 3.5GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 560 Sparkle Calibe DF 1GB Edition is a Special Edition of NVIDIA's Performance GeForce GTX 560, created by Sparkle.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit now runs at 932MHz, instead of 810MHz.

Overclock: Memory Clock
The Operating Memory Clock is now of 1122MHz, instead of 1002MHz.

Frame Buffer
Untouched.


Cooling Solution
The new upgraded versions of X560 Ti DF and X560 DF are equipped with brand new Cool Pro thermal modules. Most importantly, the exclusive 9cm Ball Bearing Fans operate stably even at high speed and avoid problems such as increase in noise and fan failures caused by bearing’s wear and tear, effectively taking away the heat generated by graphics card. Furthermore, this cooler incorporates two high-performance 8mm copper heat pipes which enable optimum heat transfer, obtaining obvious performance upgrade in cooling.

Performance
Benchmarks Indicate a 13% Performance Boost over the Reference GeForce GTX 560.
GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition is a Special Edition of the powerful GeForce GTX 680. See the standard version for more information about it.
Compared to the standard version, GeForce GTX 680 Galaxy Edition features an increased core-clock that went from 1006MHz to 1110MHz and the turbo boost from 1100MHz to 1176MHz. The amount of memory was also increased from 2GB to 4GB, proving useful if gaming at high resolutions and using many image improving techniques, though we consider this excessive.
Expect a 9% performance boost when compared to the standard card.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-
-