Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | GeForce GTX 970 EVGA FTW+ ACX 2.0+ 4GB Edition SLI | Radeon R9 280X Crossfire |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 32% | 5% |
Hitman 3 | 11% | 36% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 38% | 4% |
Resident Evil 8 | 32% | 5% |
FIFA 21 | 66% | 47% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 4% | 47% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 40% | 7% |
Genshin Impact | 32% | 5% |
The Medium | 15% | 31% |
Far Cry 6 | 1% | 52% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 EVGA FTW+ ACX 2.0+ 4GB Edition SLI are significantly better than the AMD Radeon R9 280X Crossfire.
The GTX 970 has a 366 MHz higher core clock speed but 48 fewer Texture Mapping Units than the R9 280X. The lower TMU count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the GTX 970 manages to provide 35.3 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GTX 970 has a 366 MHz higher core clock speed and 48 more Render Output Units than the R9 280X. This results in the GTX 970 providing 81.8 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The GTX 970 was released less than a year after the R9 280X, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The GTX 970 has 2048 MB more video memory than the R9 280X, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 970 also has superior memory performance overall.
The R9 280X has 127.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 970, which means that the memory performance of the R9 280X is massively better than the GTX 970.
The GeForce GTX 970 EVGA FTW+ ACX 2.0+ 4GB Edition SLI has 3328 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R9 280X Crossfire has 4096. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 970 is 6142. The GTX 970 having 2046 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 970 delivers a noticeably smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R9 280X.
The GeForce GTX 970 EVGA FTW+ ACX 2.0+ 4GB Edition SLI requires 300 Watts to run and the Radeon R9 280X Crossfire requires 550 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the GTX 970 and a PSU with at least 1000 Watts for the R9 280X. The R9 280X requires 250 Watts more than the GTX 970 to run. The difference is significant enough that the R9 280X may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 970.
Core Speed | 1216 MHz | ![]() | vs | 850 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1367 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1000 MHz | |
Architecture | Maxwell GM204-200-A1 (x2) | GCN 1.1 Tahiti XTL (x2) | |||
OC Potential | Poor | vs |
![]() | Fair | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | - | |
Release Date | 19 Sep 2014 | ![]() | vs | 01 Oct 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
1920x1080 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | ![]() |
10
|
2560x1440 | 9.9
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
3840x2160 | 7.6
|
![]() |
vs | - |
Memory | 8192 MB | ![]() | vs | 6144 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1753 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1500 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 512 Bit | vs | ![]() | 768 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 448.8GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 576GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 4096 KB | ![]() |
vs | 1536 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | yes | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 3328 | vs | ![]() | 4096 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 100% | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 100% |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 208 | vs | ![]() | 256 | |
Texture Rate | 252.9 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 217.6 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 112 | ![]() | vs | 64 | |
Pixel Rate | 136.2 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 54.4 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
DisplayPort Connections | 3 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Comparison |
Max Power | 300 Watts | ![]() | vs | 550 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 600 Watts & 42 Amps | ![]() | vs | 1000 Watts & 42 Amps |
DirectX | 12.1 | ![]() | vs | 11.2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | 4.3 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Core i7-3770K 4-Core 3.5GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 16 GB | vs | ![]() | 8 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 3840x2160 | ![]() | vs | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview GeForce GTX 970 EVGA FTW+ ACX 2.0+ 4GB Edition SLI is a solution of two GeForce GTX 970 EVGA FTW+ ACX 2.0+ 4GB Edition put together using NVIDIA's SLI Technology. Architecture The Second variant of the Maxwell Architecture, despite being also manufactured with a 28nm technology, has an extremely large L2 Cache and features a Third Generation Delta Color Compression which allows NVIDIA to produce Graphics Cards with relatively small memory data transfer rates, without causing too much impact on the overall performance. Furthermore, the Shaders have been redesigned and are both more powerful and energy efficient. The Second Revision of Maxwell also adds VXGI (Voxel Global Illumination) which makes scenes significantly more lifelike and believable as light interacts more realistically in the game environment and the MFAA technology which provides the same effect as MSAA but at a much lower performance cost. GPU It consists of 2 GPUs Codenamed GM204-200-A1 which, together, offer 3328 Shader Processing Units, 208 TMUs and 112 ROPs. The Central Unit is Clocked at 1216MHz and goes up to 1367MHz, in Turbo Mode. Memory Each GPU accesses a 4GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 256-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is adequate. The Memory Clock Operates at 1753MHz. Performance Benchmarks Indicate a 8% Performance Boost over the Reference GeForce GTX 970 in SLI. System Suggestions GeForce GTX 970 EVGA FTW+ ACX 2.0+ 4GB Edition SLI is best suited for resolutions up to and including 3840x2160. We recommend a Very Strong Processor and 16GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 980 Ti Gigabyte 6GB Edition SLI. | Radeon R9 280X Crossfire is a solution of two Radeon R9 280X put together using AMD'S Crossfire technology. Check the page of Radeon R9 280X to know more about its chip. Crossfire relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is up to 60% better than a single Radeon R9 280X performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports crossfire or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single Radeon R9 280X. Expect this combination to draw up to 550 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower. Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | - | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |