Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 295 EVGA CO-OP Hydro Copper 1792MB Edition GeForce GTX 750 Zotac 1GB Edition
Cyberpunk 2077 204% 316%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 122% 203%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 204% 316%
Valorant 78% 70%
Grand Theft Auto VI 229% 350%
Death Stranding 134% 220%
Sword Art Online: Alicization Lycoris 213% 327%
F1 2020 153% 245%
Doom Eternal 126% 208%
Hyper Scape 107% 183%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 295 EVGA CO-OP Hydro Copper 1792MB Edition are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Zotac 1GB Edition.

The GTX 750 has a 433 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 295, but the GTX 295 has 128 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 750. As a result, the GTX 295 exhibits a 62.9 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 750. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 750 has a 433 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 295, but the GTX 295 has 40 more Render Output Units than the GTX 750. As a result, the GTX 295 exhibits a 17.1 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 750. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 750 was released over three years more recently than the GTX 295, and so the GTX 750 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 295 when running the latest games.

The GTX 295 has 768 MB more video memory than the GTX 750, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 295 also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 295 has 155.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 750, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 295 is massively better than the GTX 750.

The GeForce GTX 295 EVGA CO-OP Hydro Copper 1792MB Edition has 480 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 750 Zotac 1GB Edition has 512. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 295 is 662 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 is 768. The GTX 750 having 106 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GTX 295 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The GTX 750 transistor size technology is 27 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 295. This means that the GTX 750 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 295.

The GeForce GTX 295 EVGA CO-OP Hydro Copper 1792MB Edition requires 289 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 750 Zotac 1GB Edition requires 55 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 680 Watts for the GTX 295 and a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 750. The GTX 295 requires 234 Watts more than the GTX 750 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 295 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 750.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed600 MHzvs1033 MHz
Boost Clock-vs1111 MHz
ArchitectureTesla G200-400-B3 (x2)Maxwell GM107-300-A2
OC Potential Poor vs Good
Driver Support Poor vs Great
Release Date15 Jun 2009vs18 Feb 2014
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
8.7
green tick vs
7.7
1920x1080
6.9
green tick vs
5.9
2560x1440
5.2
green tick vs
4.1
3840x2160
3.7
green tick vs
2.6

GPU Memory

Memory1792 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed1053 MHzvs1250 MHz
Memory Bus896 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth235.9GB/secvs80GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 2048 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units480vs512
Actual Shader Performance32%vs37%
Technology55nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units160vs32
Texture Rate96 GTexel/svs33.1 GTexel/s
Render Output Units56vs16
Pixel Rate33.6 GPixel/svs16.5 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power289 Wattsvs55 Watts
Recommended PSU680 Watts & 46 Ampsvs300 Watts & 18 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX10.0vs12.0
Shader Model4.0vs5.0
Open GL3.3vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-960 Quad 3.2GHzvsIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 295 EVGA CO-OP Hydro Copper 1792MB Edition is a special edition of NVIDIA's Enthusiast GeForce GTX 295, created by EVGA.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central unit is now clocked at 600MHz, instead of 576MHz.

Overclock: Memory Clock
The Operating Memory Clock is now of 1053MHz, instead of 999MHz.

Frame Buffer
Untouched.

Cooling Solution
EVGA Hydro Cooling Solution.

Performance
Benchmarks indicate a 5% performance boost over the reference GeForce GTX 295.
GeForce GTX 750 Zotac 1GB Edition is a special edition of the fast-middle-class GeForce GTX 750.
This edition comes with a custom cooling cooling solution which by itself will allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 750 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology.
Furthermore, it comes overclocked out of the box in the central unit that was raised from 1020MHz to 1033MHz, while the Turbo Boost is now of 1111MHz, instead of 1085MHz. The operating memory clock was left untouched.
Further overclocking can be achieved easily, as the GPU has great OC potential.
Benchmarks indicate its performance is around 1% better than the reference NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and thus Radeon R7 260X is still faster.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants
-
-