Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 M395X 4GB GeForce GTX 680M SLI
Cyberpunk 2077 85% 59%
Hitman 3 141% 107%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 69% 46%
Resident Evil 8 85% 59%
FIFA 21 7% 20%
Grand Theft Auto VI 161% 124%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 64% 41%
Genshin Impact 85% 59%
The Medium 131% 99%
Far Cry 6 168% 130%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 680M SLI are very slightly better than the AMD Radeon R9 M395X 4GB.

The R9 M395X has a 3 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 680M, but the GTX 680M has 96 more Texture Mapping Units than the R9 M395X. As a result, the GTX 680M exhibits a 68.8 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R9 M395X. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R9 M395X has a 3 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 680M, but the GTX 680M has 32 more Render Output Units than the R9 M395X. As a result, the GTX 680M exhibits a 23 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the R9 M395X. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 M395X was released over three years more recently than the GTX 680M, and so the R9 M395X is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 680M when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The Radeon R9 M395X 4GB and the GeForce GTX 680M SLI have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GTX 680M has 70.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R9 M395X, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 680M is much better than the R9 M395X.

The Radeon R9 M395X 4GB has 2048 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 680M SLI has 2688. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 M395X is 1259 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 680M is 1935. The GTX 680M having 676 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 680M delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R9 M395X.

The Radeon R9 M395X 4GB requires 125 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 680M SLI requires 200 Watts. The GTX 680M requires 75 Watts more than the R9 M395X to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 680M may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R9 M395X.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed723 MHzvs720 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureGCN 1.2 Amethyst XTKepler GK104 (x2)
OC Potential Fair vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs -
Release Date09 Jun 2015vs01 Jun 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

green tick vs -
vs green tick
vs green tick
vs green tick
vs green tick

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed1250 MHzvs900 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs512 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth160GB/secvs230.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 768 KB green tick vs 0 KB
Delta Color Compression yes vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2048vs2688
Actual Shader Performance61%vs93%
Texture Mapping Units128vs224
Texture Rate92.5 GTexel/svs161.3 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs64
Pixel Rate23.1 GPixel/svs46.1 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power125 Wattsvs200 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-4810MQ 4-Core 2.8GHzvsIntel Core i7-3630QM 4-Core 2.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R9 M395X 4GB is a High-End Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (CGN).

Radeon R9 M395X 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Amethyst XT which is a Third Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Tonga XT GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R9 380X.
Amethyst XT has 32 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 2048 Shader Processing Units, 128 TMUs and 32 ROPs.

The Central Unit is Clocked at 723MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 256-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1250MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 125W, it is suited for very large laptops.

Radeon R9 M395X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M295X 4GB.
Performance is Comparable to the desktop Radeon R9 280. Therefore, even GeForce GTX 970M is still faster.

System Suggestions
Radeon R9 M395X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
GeForce GTX 680M SLI is a solution of two GeForce GTX 680M put together using NVIDIA'S SLI technology.
As it's known, GeForce GTX 680M is based on the Kepler GK104 Core, featuring 1344 Shading Units but with lower clock frequencies putting its performance at level with a desktop GeForce GTX 660.
As usual, SLI relies a lot on proper driver support. Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, about 45% better than a single GeForce GTX 680M performing by itself but at times it performed worse than a single GeForce GTX 680M.
Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants