Your Graphics Research
Your Graphics Research
| Recommended System Requirements | ||
|---|---|---|
| Game | Radeon R9 M380 4GB | GeForce GTX 765M |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 253% | 265% |
| Hitman 3 | 359% | 374% |
| Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 223% | 233% |
| Resident Evil 8 | 253% | 265% |
| FIFA 21 | 78% | 84% |
| Grand Theft Auto VI | 397% | 413% |
| Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 213% | 223% |
| The Medium | 341% | 355% |
| Genshin Impact | 253% | 265% |
| Far Cry 6 | 411% | 427% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 M380 4GB are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M.
The R9 M380 has a 150 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 765M, but the GeForce GTX 765M has 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the R9 M380. As a result, the GeForce GTX 765M exhibits a 6.4 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R9 M380. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R9 M380 has a 150 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 765M and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the R9 M380 providing 2.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R9 M380 was released over a year more recently than the GeForce GTX 765M, and so the R9 M380 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce GTX 765M.
The R9 M380 has 2048 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 765M, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 M380 also has superior memory performance overall.
The R9 M380 has 31.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GTX 765M, which means that the memory performance of the R9 M380 is noticeably better than the GeForce GTX 765M.
Both the Radeon R9 M380 4GB and the GeForce GTX 765M have 768 Shader Processing Units. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, the R9 M380 has 2.4 GPixel/s better pixel fill rate and the R9 M380 has 31.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth, but the GeForce GTX 765M has 6.4 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate. Overall, the R9 M380 has slightly better performance.
The Radeon R9 M380 4GB requires 75 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 765M requires 65 Watts. The R9 M380 requires 10 Watts more than the GeForce GTX 765M to run. The difference is not significant enough for the R9 M380 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GeForce GTX 765M.
| Core Speed | 1000 MHz |  | vs | 850 MHz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
| Architecture | GCN 1.2 Strato PRO | Kepler GK106-N14E-GE-B-A1 | |||
| OC Potential | Fair |
|
vs |
| Fair |
| Driver Support | Great |
| vs | Good | |
| Release Date | 09 Jun 2015 | | vs | 30 May 2013 | |
| GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
| Approved | | | |||
| Comparison | |||||
| 1366x768 | 9.5
|
|
vs | 8.9
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1600x900 | 7.4
|
|
vs | 7
|
|
| 1920x1080 | 5.6
|
|
vs | 5.5
|
|
| 2560x1440 | 3.9
|
|
vs | 3.7
|
|
| 3840x2160 | 2.4
|
|
vs | |
2.4
|
| Memory | 4096 MB | | vs | 2048 MB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Speed | 1500 MHz | | vs | 1002 MHz | |
| Memory Bus | 128 Bit | | vs | | 128 Bit |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | | vs | | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96GB/sec | | vs | 64.1GB/sec | |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | |
vs | 256 KB | |
| Delta Color Compression | yes | vs | no | ||
| Memory Performance | 0% | |
vs | |
0% |
| Comparison | |||||
| Shader Processing Units | 768 | | vs | | 768 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Shader Performance | 31% | | vs | | 31% |
| Technology | 28nm | | vs | | 28nm |
| Texture Mapping Units | 48 | vs | | 64 | |
| Texture Rate | 48 GTexel/s | vs | | 54.4 GTexel/s | |
| Render Output Units | 16 | | vs | | 16 |
| Pixel Rate | 16 GPixel/s | | vs | 13.6 GPixel/s | |
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | | vs | | 4096x2160 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| DVI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | - | ||
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Power | 75 Watts | vs | | 65 Watts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended PSU | - | - | |||
| DirectX | 12.0 | | vs | | 12.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shader Model | 5.0 | | vs | | 5.0 |
| Open GL | 4.5 | | vs | | 4.5 |
| Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
| Notebook GPU | yes | yes | |||
| SLI/Crossfire | yes | | vs | | yes |
| Dedicated | yes | | vs | | yes |
| Comparison | |||||
| Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHz | | vs | Intel Core i7-3630QM 4-Core 2.4GHz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended RAM | 8 GB | | vs | | 8 GB |
| Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1600x900 | | vs | | 1600x900 |
| Performance Value |  | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mini Review | Overview Radeon R9 M380 4GB is a Performance Mobile Graphics Card based on the Third Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN). Architecture Radeon R9 M380 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Strato PRO which is a Third Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Tobago PRO GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 360. Strato PRO has 12 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 16 ROPs. Central Unit The Central Unit is Clocked at 1000MHz. Memory: Speed The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1500MHz. Memory: Frame Buffer The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory. However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 75W, it is suited for large laptops. Performance Radeon R9 M380 4GB is essentially a Slower Mobile Version of the Desktop Radeon R7 360. System Suggestions Radeon R9 M380 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080. We recommend a Decent Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. | Overview GeForce GTX 760M is a Performance Mobile Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Kepler Architecture. Architecture The Kepler Architecture was NVIDIA's big step to power efficiency. Each Stream Multiprocessor (SMX) now hosts 192 Shader Processing Units - against the 48 of older Fermi Architecture, and has been redesigned being now clocked at the same speed of the Central Unit. This means they are more energy efficient and will consequently lead to cooler operating temperatures. However, it also means they are weaker. It can be said that one Fermi SMX is as fast as 2 Kepler SMXs. Additionally, and not available in all GPUs, Kepler also introduced the Boost Clock Feature. The Boost Clock is an even higher Clock Speed activated when in gaming mode and becomes the effective speed of the GPU. GPU It equips a GPU Codenamed GK106-N14E-GE-B-A1 which has 4 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 64 TMUs and 16 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 850MHz. Memory The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 1002MHz. Features DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for SLI, Kepler Boost, Optimus, CUDA, OpenCL, DirectCompute, 3D Vision Surround, PhysX, Realtime Raytracing and other technologies Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 65W, it is suited for large laptops. Performance Despite being underclocked, when compared to GeForce GTX 650 Ti, GeForce GTX 765M ends up performing better in most cases as fast since the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology allows an even higher Central Unit Speed, which most times exceeds the 950MHz. Gaming benchmarks indicate its performance is on average with the desktop GeForce GTX 650 Ti. System Suggestions We recommend a Powerful Processor (Intel Core i7 Mobile) and 8GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 765M. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended CPU | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Possible GPU Upgrades | N/A | N/A | |||
| GPU Variants | - | ||||