Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 M380 4GB GeForce GTX 765M
Cyberpunk 2077 253% 265%
Hitman 3 359% 374%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 223% 233%
Resident Evil 8 253% 265%
FIFA 21 78% 84%
Grand Theft Auto VI 397% 413%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 213% 223%
The Medium 341% 355%
Genshin Impact 253% 265%
Far Cry 6 411% 427%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 M380 4GB are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M.

The R9 M380 has a 150 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 765M, but the GeForce GTX 765M has 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the R9 M380. As a result, the GeForce GTX 765M exhibits a 6.4 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R9 M380. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R9 M380 has a 150 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 765M and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the R9 M380 providing 2.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 M380 was released over a year more recently than the GeForce GTX 765M, and so the R9 M380 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce GTX 765M.

The R9 M380 has 2048 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 765M, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 M380 also has superior memory performance overall.

The R9 M380 has 31.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GTX 765M, which means that the memory performance of the R9 M380 is noticeably better than the GeForce GTX 765M.

Both the Radeon R9 M380 4GB and the GeForce GTX 765M have 768 Shader Processing Units. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, the R9 M380 has 2.4 GPixel/s better pixel fill rate and the R9 M380 has 31.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth, but the GeForce GTX 765M has 6.4 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate. Overall, the R9 M380 has slightly better performance.

The Radeon R9 M380 4GB requires 75 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 765M requires 65 Watts. The R9 M380 requires 10 Watts more than the GeForce GTX 765M to run. The difference is not significant enough for the R9 M380 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GeForce GTX 765M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1000 MHzvs850 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureGCN 1.2 Strato PROKepler GK106-N14E-GE-B-A1
OC Potential Fair vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date09 Jun 2015vs30 May 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
9.5
green tick vs
8.9
1600x900
7.4
green tick vs
7
1920x1080
5.6
green tick vs
5.5
2560x1440
3.9
green tick vs
3.7
3840x2160
2.4
green tick vs green tick
2.4

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1500 MHzvs1002 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth96GB/secvs64.1GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs 256 KB
Delta Color Compression yes vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units768vs768
Actual Shader Performance31%vs31%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units48vs64
Texture Rate48 GTexel/svs54.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs16
Pixel Rate16 GPixel/svs13.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power75 Wattsvs65 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHzvsIntel Core i7-3630QM 4-Core 2.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R9 M380 4GB is a Performance Mobile Graphics Card based on the Third Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN).

Architecture
Radeon R9 M380 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Strato PRO which is a Third Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Tobago PRO GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 360.
Strato PRO has 12 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

Central Unit
The Central Unit is Clocked at 1000MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1500MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 75W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Radeon R9 M380 4GB is essentially a Slower Mobile Version of the Desktop Radeon R7 360.

System Suggestions
Radeon R9 M380 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080. We recommend a Decent Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Overview
GeForce GTX 760M is a Performance Mobile Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
The Kepler Architecture was NVIDIA's big step to power efficiency. Each Stream Multiprocessor (SMX) now hosts 192 Shader Processing Units - against the 48 of older Fermi Architecture, and has been redesigned being now clocked at the same speed of the Central Unit. This means they are more energy efficient and will consequently lead to cooler operating temperatures. However, it also means they are weaker. It can be said that one Fermi SMX is as fast as 2 Kepler SMXs.
Additionally, and not available in all GPUs, Kepler also introduced the Boost Clock Feature. The Boost Clock is an even higher Clock Speed activated when in gaming mode and becomes the effective speed of the GPU.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GK106-N14E-GE-B-A1 which has 4 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 64 TMUs and 16 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 850MHz.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 1002MHz.

Features
DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for SLI, Kepler Boost, Optimus, CUDA, OpenCL, DirectCompute, 3D Vision Surround, PhysX, Realtime Raytracing and other technologies

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 65W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Despite being underclocked, when compared to GeForce GTX 650 Ti, GeForce GTX 765M ends up performing better in most cases as fast since the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology allows an even higher Central Unit Speed, which most times exceeds the 950MHz.
Gaming benchmarks indicate its performance is on average with the desktop GeForce GTX 650 Ti.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Powerful Processor (Intel Core i7 Mobile) and 8GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 765M.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-