Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 M390 4GB GeForce GTX 765M
Cyberpunk 2077 135% 265%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 115% 233%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 108% 223%
FIFA 21 19% 84%
Grand Theft Auto VI 231% 413%
Hitman 3 206% 374%
Genshin Impact 135% 265%
Far Cry 6 241% 427%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 238% 423%
Watch Dogs Legion 127% 252%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 M390 4GB are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M.

The R9 M390 and the GeForce GTX 765M have the same core clock speed of 850 MHz, but the R9 M390 has 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce GTX 765M. As a result, the R9 M390 exhibits a 13.6 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GeForce GTX 765M. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R9 M390 and the GeForce GTX 765M have the same core clock speed of 850 MHz, but the R9 M390 has 16 more Render Output Units than the GeForce GTX 765M. As a result, the R9 M390 exhibits a 13.6 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GeForce GTX 765M. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 M390 was released over a year more recently than the GeForce GTX 765M, and so the R9 M390 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce GTX 765M.

The R9 M390 has 2048 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 765M, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 M390 also has superior memory performance overall.

The R9 M390 has 89.5 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GTX 765M, which means that the memory performance of the R9 M390 is much better than the GeForce GTX 765M.

The Radeon R9 M390 4GB has 1280 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 765M has 768. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 M390 is 979 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 765M is 653. The R9 M390 having 326 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 M390 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce GTX 765M.

The Radeon R9 M390 4GB requires 100 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 765M requires 65 Watts. The R9 M390 requires 35 Watts more than the GeForce GTX 765M to run. The difference is significant enough that the R9 M390 may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GeForce GTX 765M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed850 MHzvs850 MHz
Boost Clock900 MHzvs-
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Neptune XTKepler GK106-N14E-GE-B-A1
OC Potential Fair vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date09 Jun 2015vs30 May 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs
8.9
1600x900
8.8
green tick vs
7
1920x1080
6.9
green tick vs
5.5
2560x1440
5.1
green tick vs
3.7
3840x2160
3.5
green tick vs
2.4

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1200 MHzvs1002 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth153.6GB/secvs64.1GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs 256 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units1280vs768
Actual Shader Performance47%vs31%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units80vs64
Texture Rate68 GTexel/svs54.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs16
Pixel Rate27.2 GPixel/svs13.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power100 Wattsvs65 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-4810MQ 4-Core 2.8GHzvsIntel Core i7-3630QM 4-Core 2.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R9 M390 4GB is a High-End Mobile Graphics Card based on the Second Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN).

Architecture
Radeon R9 M390 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Neptune XT which is a Second Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Curacao XT GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R9 270X.
Neptune XT has 20 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 1280 Shader Processing Units, 80 TMUs and 32 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit is Clocked at 850MHz and goes up to 900MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 256-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1200MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 100W, it is suited for very large laptops.

Performance
Radeon R9 M390X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M290X 4GB.
Performance is Comparable to the desktop Radeon R9 270.

System Suggestions
Radeon R9 M390 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Overview
GeForce GTX 760M is a Performance Mobile Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
The Kepler Architecture was NVIDIA's big step to power efficiency. Each Stream Multiprocessor (SMX) now hosts 192 Shader Processing Units - against the 48 of older Fermi Architecture, and has been redesigned being now clocked at the same speed of the Central Unit. This means they are more energy efficient and will consequently lead to cooler operating temperatures. However, it also means they are weaker. It can be said that one Fermi SMX is as fast as 2 Kepler SMXs.
Additionally, and not available in all GPUs, Kepler also introduced the Boost Clock Feature. The Boost Clock is an even higher Clock Speed activated when in gaming mode and becomes the effective speed of the GPU.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GK106-N14E-GE-B-A1 which has 4 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 64 TMUs and 16 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 850MHz.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 1002MHz.

Features
DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for SLI, Kepler Boost, Optimus, CUDA, OpenCL, DirectCompute, 3D Vision Surround, PhysX, Realtime Raytracing and other technologies

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 65W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Despite being underclocked, when compared to GeForce GTX 650 Ti, GeForce GTX 765M ends up performing better in most cases as fast since the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology allows an even higher Central Unit Speed, which most times exceeds the 950MHz.
Gaming benchmarks indicate its performance is on average with the desktop GeForce GTX 650 Ti.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Powerful Processor (Intel Core i7 Mobile) and 8GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 765M.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-