Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R7 240 v2 HIS iCooler Boost Clock 2GB Edition | Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 617% | 154% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 556% | 133% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 535% | 125% |
Hitman 3 | 833% | 231% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 910% | 258% |
FIFA 21 | 262% | 28% |
Far Cry 6 | 938% | 268% |
Genshin Impact | 617% | 154% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 929% | 265% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 592% | 145% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition are massively better than the AMD Radeon R7 240 v2 HIS iCooler Boost Clock 2GB Edition.
The HD 7850 has a 245 MHz higher core clock speed and 44 more Texture Mapping Units than the R7 240. This results in the HD 7850 providing 47.8 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The HD 7850 has a 245 MHz higher core clock speed and 24 more Render Output Units than the R7 240. This results in the HD 7850 providing 25.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R7 240 was released over a year more recently than the HD 7850, and so the R7 240 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the HD 7850.
The R7 240 has 1024 MB more video memory than the HD 7850, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the HD 7850 has superior memory performance.
The HD 7850 has 80 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R7 240, which means that the memory performance of the HD 7850 is much better than the R7 240.
The Radeon R7 240 v2 HIS iCooler Boost Clock 2GB Edition has 320 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition has 1024. However, the actual shader performance of the R7 240 is 212 and the actual shader performance of the HD 7850 is 849. The HD 7850 having 637 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the HD 7850 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R7 240.
The Radeon R7 240 v2 HIS iCooler Boost Clock 2GB Edition requires 30 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 240 and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the HD 7850. The HD 7850 has been recommended a PSU with 100 Watts more than the R7 240. The difference is significant enough that the HD 7850 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R7 240.
Core Speed | 730 MHz | vs | ![]() | 975 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 780 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Architecture | GCN 1.1 Oland PRO | GCN 1.0 Pitcairn PRO | |||
OC Potential | Good |
![]() |
vs | Fair | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | Good | |
Release Date | 09 Oct 2013 | ![]() | vs | 01 Jun 2012 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 6.8
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 5.2
|
vs | ![]() |
8.5
|
|
1920x1080 | 3.7
|
vs | ![]() |
6.6
|
|
2560x1440 | 2.5
|
vs | ![]() |
4.9
|
|
3840x2160 | 1.7
|
vs | ![]() |
3.1
|
Memory | 2048 MB | ![]() | vs | 1024 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1150 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1200 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | vs | ![]() | 256 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 73.6GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 153.6GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
512 KB |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 320 | vs | ![]() | 1024 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 10% | vs | ![]() | 41% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 20 | vs | ![]() | 64 | |
Texture Rate | 14.6 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 62.4 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 8 | vs | ![]() | 32 | |
Pixel Rate | 5.8 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 31.2 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
DVI Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 30 Watts | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 400 Watts & 27 Amps | ![]() | vs | 500 Watts |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4.4 |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 3.0GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1600x900 | vs | ![]() | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview Radeon R7 240 v2 HIS iCooler Boost Clock 2GB Edition is a special edition of AMD's Middle-Class Radeon R7 240 v2, created by HIS. Overclock: Central Unit None. Overclock: Memory Clock None. Memory: Frame Buffer The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 2GB. However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 2GB of Memory are needed - such as 1080p Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick. Cooling Solution The card is equipped with iCooler, making it extremely quiet and noise level is less than 28dB. Performance Benchmarks Indicate no Performance Boost over the Reference Radeon R7 240 v2. | Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition is a special edition of the powerful Radeon HD 7850. See the standard version for more information about it. The differences include an increase on the core-clock that went from 860MHz to 975MHz. Benchmarks indicate a 7% boost when compared to the standard edition. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - | - |