Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game HD i7 6700T Radeon R7 240 2GB
Cyberpunk 2077 732% 786%
Hitman 3 982% 1053%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 661% 711%
Resident Evil 8 732% 786%
FIFA 21 320% 347%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1071% 1147%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 636% 684%
The Medium 938% 1006%
Genshin Impact 732% 786%
Far Cry 6 1104% 1182%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel HD i7 6700T are very slightly better than the AMD Radeon R7 240 2GB.

The R7 240 has a 380 MHz higher core clock speed and 4 more Texture Mapping Units than the HD i7 6700T. This results in the R7 240 providing 9 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R7 240 has a 380 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD i7 6700T and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the R7 240 providing 3 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The HD i7 6700T was released over a year more recently than the R7 240, and so the HD i7 6700T is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the R7 240.

The R7 240 has 2048 MB video memory, but the HD i7 6700T does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The HD i7 6700T has 24 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R7 240 2GB has 320. However, the actual shader performance of the HD i7 6700T is 211 and the actual shader performance of the R7 240 is 212. The R7 240 having 1 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R7 240 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the HD i7 6700T.

The HD i7 6700T transistor size technology is 14 nm (nanometers) smaller than the R7 240. This means that the HD i7 6700T is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the R7 240. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the HD i7 6700T should consume less power than the R7 240.

The HD i7 6700T requires 35 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 240 2GB requires 30 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the HD i7 6700T and a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 240. The HD i7 6700T requires 5 Watts more than the R7 240 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the HD i7 6700T to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the R7 240.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed350 MHzvs730 MHz
Boost Clock1100 MHzvs780 MHz
ArchitectureSkylake GT2-R0GCN 1.1 Oland PRO
OC Potential None vs Good
Driver Support Great vs Great
Release Date01 Sep 2015vs08 Oct 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
6.3
vs green tick
6.4
1600x900
4.8
vs green tick
4.9
1920x1080
3.3
green tick vs
3.1
2560x1440
2.3
green tick vs green tick
2.3
3840x2160
1.6
green tick vs
1.5

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs2048 MB
Memory Speed1067 MHzvs900 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR4vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth34.1GB/secvs28.8GB/sec
L2 Cache 1024 KB green tick vs 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units24vs320
Actual Shader Performance10%vs10%
Technology14nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units16vs20
Texture Rate5.6 GTexel/svs14.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs8
Pixel Rate2.8 GPixel/svs5.8 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power35 Wattsvs30 Watts
Recommended PSU300 Watts & 20 Ampsvs400 Watts & 18 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.1vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-6700T 4-Core 2.8GHzvsIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1366x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Intel HD i7 6700T is the specific version of Intel HD Graphics 530 Desktop that is integrated in the Core i7-6700T Processor.

Architecture
The Skylake Core includes support for DirectX 12.1, OpenCL 2.0 and OpenGL 4.4. Additionally, it also supports DDR4 Memory.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GT2 which offers 24 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit Initially Runs at 350MHz and goes up to 1100MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU Shares the System's RAM which varies from laptop to laptop. Typically, the GPU reserves 1.7GB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on the at which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. In this case, it is 1067MHz.
It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system.

Performance
Gaming benchmarks put its performance almost on level with a dedicated GeForce 920M.

System Suggestions
Intel HD i7 6700T is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1366x768. We recommend a Decent Processor and 4GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Note: This Graphics Card has 2 variants: one with DDR3 and another with GDDR5. This is the DDR3 Version.

Radeon R7 240 2GB offers a core codenamed Oland PRO and thus features 320 Shader Processing Units, 20 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on a 128-bit bus width of standard DDR3. While the central unit runs at 730MHz and goes up to 780MHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 900MHz.
With a rated board TDP of 30W, it requires no extra power connectors.

Compared to Radeon R7 250, its performance is significantly lower (over 25% slower), especially at higher resolutions due to the limited memory bandwidth. Still, the TDP is relatively low and so this card may be used on low end systems and offer a reasonable upgrade, when compared to integrated graphics.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-