Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 6150 SE 256MB GeForce 2 MX 100/200 32MB
Cyberpunk 2077 22057% 31289%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 20165% 28608%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 19508% 27678%
Hitman 3 28724% 40733%
Grand Theft Auto VI 31076% 44067%
FIFA 21 11076% 15733%
Far Cry 6 31959% 45317%
Genshin Impact 22057% 31289%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 31665% 44900%
Watch Dogs Legion 21273% 30178%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 6150 SE 256MB are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce 2 MX 100/200 32MB.

The 6150 SE was released over three years more recently than the 2 MX, and so the 6150 SE is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the 2 MX when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The 6150 SE has 224 MB more video memory than the 2 MX, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the 6150 SE also has superior memory performance overall.

The 2 MX has 1.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the 6150 SE, which means that the memory performance of the 2 MX is marginally better than the 6150 SE.

Both the GeForce 6150 SE 256MB and the GeForce 2 MX 100/200 32MB have 2 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the 6150 SE is 1 and by the 2 MX is 0. Knowing that the shader performance of the 6150 SE is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed425 MHzvs175 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureMCP61NV11
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Jun 2006vs03 Mar 2001
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs32 MB
Memory Speed-vs166 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth-vs1.3GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs2
Actual Shader Performance0%vs-
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs1600x1200
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0cvs7
Shader Model3.0vs-
Open GL1.5vs1.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe NVIDIA GeForce 6500, 6200, 6150 and 6100 GPUs feature a revolutionary design that delivers best-in-class performance on today's hottest games and applications. The only GPUs in their class to support Microsoft DirectX 9.0 Shader Model 3.0, these GPUs power the latest effects without compromising performance. Further, these GPUs include NVIDIA PureVideo to deliver crisp, vibrant video to the PC.GeForce2 MX 100/200 32MB is part of the GeForce2 Series released by NVIDIA in 2000/2001. With very few dedicated memory and only DirectX 7.0 (and less) support, even games from 2002 will require reduced settings. Therefore, it can't play today's current games.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-