Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | GeForce GTX 980 Point of View 4GB Edition | Radeon R9 270X Crossfire |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1% | 21% |
Hitman 3 | 31% | 58% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 8% | 11% |
Resident Evil 8 | 1% | 21% |
FIFA 21 | 49% | 39% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 42% | 71% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 11% | 7% |
Genshin Impact | 1% | 21% |
The Medium | 26% | 51% |
Far Cry 6 | 46% | 76% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Point of View 4GB Edition are noticeably better than the AMD Radeon R9 270X Crossfire.
The GTX 980 has a 127 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 270X, but the R9 270X has 32 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 980. As a result, the R9 270X exhibits a 15.7 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 980. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GTX 980 has a 127 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 270X and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 980 providing 8.1 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The GTX 980 was released less than a year after the R9 270X, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The GeForce GTX 980 Point of View 4GB Edition and the Radeon R9 270X Crossfire have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.
The R9 270X has 134 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 980, which means that the memory performance of the R9 270X is massively better than the GTX 980.
The GeForce GTX 980 Point of View 4GB Edition has 2048 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R9 270X Crossfire has 2560. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 980 is 3362 and the actual shader performance of the R9 270X is 2285. The GTX 980 having 1077 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the R9 270X performs better when taking into account other relevant data.
The GeForce GTX 980 Point of View 4GB Edition requires 165 Watts to run and the Radeon R9 270X Crossfire requires 360 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the GTX 980 and a PSU with at least 750 Watts for the R9 270X. The R9 270X requires 195 Watts more than the GTX 980 to run. The difference is significant enough that the R9 270X may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 980.
Core Speed | 1127 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1000 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1216 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1050 MHz | |
Architecture | Maxwell GM204-400-A1 | GCN 1.1 Curacao XT (x2) | |||
OC Potential | Fair |
![]() |
vs | Poor | |
Driver Support | Great | vs | Great | ||
Release Date | 19 Sep 2014 | ![]() | vs | 08 Oct 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
1920x1080 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | 9.6
|
|
2560x1440 | 7.9
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
3840x2160 | 5.9
|
![]() |
vs | - |
Memory | 4096 MB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096 MB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1753 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1400 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 256 Bit | vs | ![]() | 512 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 224.4GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 358.4GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 2048 KB | ![]() |
vs | 1024 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | yes | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 2048 | vs | ![]() | 2560 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 100% | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 100% |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 128 | vs | ![]() | 160 | |
Texture Rate | 144.3 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 160 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 64 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 64 |
Pixel Rate | 72.1 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 64 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 5120x3200 | ![]() | vs | 4096x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | 3 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Comparison |
Max Power | 165 Watts | ![]() | vs | 360 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 500 Watts & 42 Amps | ![]() | vs | 750 Watts |
DirectX | 12.1 | ![]() | vs | 12.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | 4.4 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | no | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 2560x1440 | ![]() | vs | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview GeForce GTX 980 Point of View 4GB Edition is a Special Edition of NVIDIA's High-End GeForce GTX 980 4GB, created by Point of View. Overclock: Central Unit None. Overclock: Memory Clock None. Frame Buffer Untouched. Cooling Solution Point of View Dual Fan Cooling Solution. Performance Benchmarks Indicate no Performance Boost over the Reference GeForce GTX 980 4GB. | Radeon R9 270X Crossfire is a solution of two Radeon R9 270X put together using AMD'S Crossfire technology. Check the page of Radeon R9 270X to know more about its chip. Crossfire relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is up to x% better than a single Radeon R9 270X performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports crossfire or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single Radeon R9 270X. Expect this combination to draw up to 360 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower. Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | - | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |