Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 965M 4GB GeForce GTX 765M
Cyberpunk 2077 135% 265%
Hitman 3 206% 374%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 115% 233%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 108% 223%
FIFA 21 19% 84%
Grand Theft Auto VI 231% 413%
Far Cry 6 241% 427%
Genshin Impact 135% 265%
Battlefield 6 206% 374%
Resident Evil 8 135% 265%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M 4GB are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M.

The GTX 965M has a 74 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the GeForce GTX 765M. This results in the GTX 965M providing 4.7 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 965M has a 74 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Render Output Units than the GeForce GTX 765M. This results in the GTX 965M providing 16 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 965M was released over a year more recently than the GeForce GTX 765M, and so the GTX 965M is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce GTX 765M.

The GTX 965M has 2048 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 765M, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 965M also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 965M has 15.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GTX 765M, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 965M is slightly better than the GeForce GTX 765M.

The GeForce GTX 965M 4GB has 1024 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 765M has 768. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 965M is 1313 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 765M is 653. The GTX 965M having 660 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 965M delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce GTX 765M.

The GeForce GTX 965M 4GB requires 50 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 765M requires 65 Watts. The GeForce GTX 765M requires 15 Watts more than the GTX 965M to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GeForce GTX 765M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GTX 965M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed924 MHzvs850 MHz
Boost Clock950 MHzvs-
ArchitectureMaxwell GM204-N16E-GSKepler GK106-N14E-GE-B-A1
OC Potential Fair vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date07 Jan 2015vs30 May 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs
8.9
1600x900
9
green tick vs
7
1920x1080
6.9
green tick vs
5.5
2560x1440
5.1
green tick vs
3.7
3840x2160
3.5
green tick vs
2.4

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1250 MHzvs1002 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth80GB/secvs64.1GB/sec
L2 Cache 2048 KB green tick vs 256 KB
Delta Color Compression yes vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units1024vs768
Actual Shader Performance63%vs31%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units64vs64
Texture Rate59.1 GTexel/svs54.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs16
Pixel Rate29.6 GPixel/svs13.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power50 Wattsvs65 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.1vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-4710MQ 4-Core 2.5GHzvsIntel Core i7-3630QM 4-Core 2.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 965M 4GB is a Performance Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Maxwell architecture.

Architecture
GeForce GTX 965M 4GB Equips the GPU Codenamed GM204-N16E-GS which is a Second Gen Maxwell GPU and has 8 SM activated. It offers 1024 Shader Processing Units, 64 TMUs and 32 ROPs.

GPU
The central unit runs at 924MHz and goes up to 950MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1253MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The Frame Buffer was doubled to 4GB. This would prove useful in a few circumstances because some modern 3D Games require 4GB of Memory for Textures.
However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 2560x1600 Gaming, a Larger Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick.

Power Consumption
GeForce GTX 965M 4GB has a Rated Board TDP of 50W.

Performance
Because GeForce GTX 965M 4GB is best suited for 1080p Gaming, it is overall as fast as GeForce GTX 965M 2GB.
All modern games should run comfortably at 1080p. It can be said its performance lies somewhere between a desktop GeForce GTX 660 and a Radeon R9 270 which are both powerful Graphics Cards.

System Suggestions
We Recommend a High-End Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Overview
GeForce GTX 760M is a Performance Mobile Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
The Kepler Architecture was NVIDIA's big step to power efficiency. Each Stream Multiprocessor (SMX) now hosts 192 Shader Processing Units - against the 48 of older Fermi Architecture, and has been redesigned being now clocked at the same speed of the Central Unit. This means they are more energy efficient and will consequently lead to cooler operating temperatures. However, it also means they are weaker. It can be said that one Fermi SMX is as fast as 2 Kepler SMXs.
Additionally, and not available in all GPUs, Kepler also introduced the Boost Clock Feature. The Boost Clock is an even higher Clock Speed activated when in gaming mode and becomes the effective speed of the GPU.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GK106-N14E-GE-B-A1 which has 4 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 64 TMUs and 16 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 850MHz.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 1002MHz.

Features
DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for SLI, Kepler Boost, Optimus, CUDA, OpenCL, DirectCompute, 3D Vision Surround, PhysX, Realtime Raytracing and other technologies

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 65W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Despite being underclocked, when compared to GeForce GTX 650 Ti, GeForce GTX 765M ends up performing better in most cases as fast since the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology allows an even higher Central Unit Speed, which most times exceeds the 950MHz.
Gaming benchmarks indicate its performance is on average with the desktop GeForce GTX 650 Ti.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Powerful Processor (Intel Core i7 Mobile) and 8GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 765M.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants