Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R9 380X HIS IceQ X² OC 4GB Edition | Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 53% | 154% |
Hitman 3 | 99% | 231% |
Resident Evil 8 | 53% | 154% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 40% | 133% |
FIFA 21 | 23% | 28% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 116% | 258% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 36% | 125% |
Genshin Impact | 53% | 154% |
Far Cry 6 | 122% | 268% |
The Medium | 91% | 217% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 380X HIS IceQ X² OC 4GB Edition are significantly better than the AMD Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition.
The R9 380X has a 15 MHz higher core clock speed and 64 more Texture Mapping Units than the HD 7850. This results in the R9 380X providing 64.3 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R9 380X has a 15 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 7850 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the R9 380X providing 0.5 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R9 380X was released over three years more recently than the HD 7850, and so the R9 380X is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the HD 7850 when running the latest games.
The R9 380X has 3072 MB more video memory than the HD 7850, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 380X also has superior memory performance overall.
The R9 380X has 28.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the HD 7850, which means that the memory performance of the R9 380X is slightly better than the HD 7850.
The Radeon R9 380X HIS IceQ X² OC 4GB Edition has 2048 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition has 1024. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 380X is 1723 and the actual shader performance of the HD 7850 is 849. The R9 380X having 874 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 380X delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the HD 7850.
The Radeon R9 380X HIS IceQ X² OC 4GB Edition requires 190 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the R9 380X and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the HD 7850. The two GPUs have been recommended a PSU with the same amount of wattage. As such, there is no need to worry about which will more significantly affect your yearly electricity bills.
Core Speed | 990 MHz | ![]() | vs | 975 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | GCN 1.2 Antigua XT | GCN 1.0 Pitcairn PRO | |||
OC Potential | Fair |
![]() |
vs |
![]() | Fair |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | Good | |
Release Date | 19 Nov 2015 | ![]() | vs | 01 Jun 2012 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | 8.5
|
|
1920x1080 | 8.6
|
![]() |
vs | 6.6
|
|
2560x1440 | 6.4
|
![]() |
vs | 4.9
|
|
3840x2160 | 4.9
|
![]() |
vs | 3.1
|
Memory | 4096 MB | ![]() | vs | 1024 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1425 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1200 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 256 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 256 Bit |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 182.4GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 153.6GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 768 KB | ![]() |
vs | 512 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | yes | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 2048 | ![]() | vs | 1024 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 83% | ![]() | vs | 41% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 128 | ![]() | vs | 64 | |
Texture Rate | 126.7 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 62.4 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 32 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 32 |
Pixel Rate | 31.7 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 31.2 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 2 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2 |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Comparison |
Max Power | 190 Watts | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 500 Watts & 33 Amps | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 500 Watts |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | 4.4 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-4690K 3.5GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Core i5-3330 3.0GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1920x1080 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview Radeon R9 380X HIS IceQ X² Turbo 4GB Edition is a Special Edition of AMD's Performance Radeon R9 380X, created by HIS. Overclock: Central Unit The Central Unit is now of 990MHz, instead of 970MHz. Overclock: Memory Clock None. Frame Buffer Untouched. Cooling Solution IceQ X²: One of the quietest coolers, making the card quieter than the reference cooler. The card is below 28dB when watching movies, surfing Facebook, working. The card remains quiet whether you are gaming, online socializing, entertaining or working. Performance Benchmarks Indicate a 1% Performance Boost over the Reference Radeon R9 380X. | Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition is a special edition of the powerful Radeon HD 7850. See the standard version for more information about it. The differences include an increase on the core-clock that went from 860MHz to 975MHz. Benchmarks indicate a 7% boost when compared to the standard edition. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - | - |