Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 940MX 2GB Radeon R6 6700T
Cyberpunk 2077 495% 2711%
Hitman 3 674% 3557%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 444% 2471%
Resident Evil 8 495% 2711%
FIFA 21 200% 1318%
Grand Theft Auto VI 737% 3855%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 426% 2388%
Genshin Impact 495% 2711%
The Medium 642% 3407%
Far Cry 6 761% 3967%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 940MX 2GB are massively better than the AMD Radeon R6 6700T.

The GeForce 940MX 2GB has a 622 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon R6 6700T. This results in the GeForce 940MX 2GB providing 22.9 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce 940MX 2GB has a 622 MHz higher core clock speed and 4 more Render Output Units than the Radeon R6 6700T. This results in the GeForce 940MX 2GB providing 7 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce 940MX 2GB was released over a year more recently than the Radeon R6 6700T, and so the GeForce 940MX 2GB is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Radeon R6 6700T.

The GeForce 940MX 2GB has 2048 MB video memory, but the Radeon R6 6700T does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The GeForce 940MX 2GB has 384 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R6 6700T has 128. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce 940MX 2GB is 644 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon R6 6700T is 42. The GeForce 940MX 2GB having 602 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce 940MX 2GB delivers a noticeably smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Radeon R6 6700T.

The GeForce 940MX 2GB requires 25 Watts to run and the Radeon R6 6700T requires 5 Watts. The GeForce 940MX 2GB requires 20 Watts more than the Radeon R6 6700T to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GeForce 940MX 2GB to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Radeon R6 6700T.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1122 MHzvs500 MHz
Boost Clock1242 MHzvs-
ArchitectureMaxwell GM108-N16S-GTRPuma Mullins ML-A1
OC Potential Poor vs None
Driver Support Great vs -
Release Date01 Mar 2016vs29 Apr 2014
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
7.4
green tick vs -
1600x900
5.7
green tick vs -
1920x1080
4.2
green tick vs -
2560x1440
2.8
green tick vs -
3840x2160
1.9
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed1001 MHzvs667 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth16GB/secvs10.7GB/sec
L2 Cache 2048 KB green tick vs 1024 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units384vs128
Actual Shader Performance31%vs2%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units24vs8
Texture Rate26.9 GTexel/svs4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs4
Pixel Rate9 GPixel/svs2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power25 Wattsvs5 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs11.2
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-6300HQ 2.3GHzvsAMD APU A10 Micro-6700T Quad-Core
Recommended RAM8 GBvs4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1024x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce 940MX 2GB is a Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the Maxwell Architecture.

Architecture
GeForce 940MX 2GB Features a GPU Codenamed GM108-N16S-GTR which is a First Gen Maxwell GPU and is identical to the GM108-N16S-GT-S used on GeForce 940M but with the addition of GDDR5 Support.
GM108-N16S-GTR has 3 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 24 TMUs and 8 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit is Clocked at 1122Hz and goes up to 1242MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with DDR3 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 64-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1001MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 2GB.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small and medium sized laptops.

Performance
Equipped with DDR3, GeForce GT 940MX is only slightly faster than GeForce GT 940M.

System Suggestions
GeForce 940MX 2GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1366x768. We Recommend a Middle-Class Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Radeon R6 6700T is an integrated Graphics Card in the APU A10 Micro-6700T Quad-Core.
It is based on the Graphics Core Next Architecture and offers 128 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs. While the central unit is set at 300MHz, the memory bus-width will be of 64-bit, as the processor only support single channeled RAM. The memory clock runs at up to 667MHz.
The Graphics Card also shares the processor's L2 Cache of 2MB. Therefore, it reduces the need to resort to its memory bandwidth.
Therefore, the Graphics Card's performance depends a lot on the system configuration. Best case scenario, expect performance similar to the integrated Intel HD 3000.
The card is only suited for gaming below 720p and not all modern demanding games can be played, even at least on low settings.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-