Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 940MX 2GB Radeon R9 M365X 4GB
Cyberpunk 2077 495% 438%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 444% 392%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 426% 376%
FIFA 21 200% 171%
Grand Theft Auto VI 737% 657%
Hitman 3 674% 600%
Genshin Impact 495% 438%
Far Cry 6 761% 679%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 753% 671%
Watch Dogs Legion 474% 419%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 M365X 4GB are very slightly better than the Nvidia GeForce 940MX 2GB.

The GeForce 940MX 2GB has a 497 MHz higher core clock speed but 16 fewer Texture Mapping Units than the R9 M365X. The lower TMU count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the GeForce 940MX 2GB manages to provide 1.9 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce 940MX 2GB has a 497 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 M365X, but the R9 M365X has 8 more Render Output Units than the GeForce 940MX 2GB. As a result, the R9 M365X exhibits a 1 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GeForce 940MX 2GB. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce 940MX 2GB was released less than a year after the R9 M365X, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The R9 M365X has 2048 MB more video memory than the GeForce 940MX 2GB, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 M365X also has superior memory performance overall.

The R9 M365X has 48 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 940MX 2GB, which means that the memory performance of the R9 M365X is noticeably better than the GeForce 940MX 2GB.

The GeForce 940MX 2GB has 384 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R9 M365X 4GB has 640. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce 940MX 2GB is 644 and the actual shader performance of the R9 M365X is 340. The GeForce 940MX 2GB having 304 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the R9 M365X performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The GeForce 940MX 2GB requires 25 Watts to run and the Radeon R9 M365X 4GB requires 50 Watts. The R9 M365X requires 25 Watts more than the GeForce 940MX 2GB to run. The difference is not significant enough for the R9 M365X to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GeForce 940MX 2GB.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1122 MHzvs625 MHz
Boost Clock1242 MHzvs-
ArchitectureMaxwell GM108-N16S-GTRGCN 1.0 Venus PRO
OC Potential Poor vs Good
Driver Support Great vs Great
Release Date01 Mar 2016vs09 Jun 2015
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
7.4
vs green tick
7.7
1600x900
5.7
vs green tick
5.9
1920x1080
4.2
vs green tick
4.5
2560x1440
2.8
vs green tick
3
3840x2160
1.9
vs green tick
2

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed1001 MHzvs1000 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth16GB/secvs64GB/sec
L2 Cache 2048 KB green tick vs 256 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units384vs640
Actual Shader Performance31%vs16%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units24vs40
Texture Rate26.9 GTexel/svs25 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs16
Pixel Rate9 GPixel/svs10 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs0
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power25 Wattsvs50 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-6300HQ 2.3GHzvsIntel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce 940MX 2GB is a Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the Maxwell Architecture.

Architecture
GeForce 940MX 2GB Features a GPU Codenamed GM108-N16S-GTR which is a First Gen Maxwell GPU and is identical to the GM108-N16S-GT-S used on GeForce 940M but with the addition of GDDR5 Support.
GM108-N16S-GTR has 3 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 24 TMUs and 8 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit is Clocked at 1122Hz and goes up to 1242MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with DDR3 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 64-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1001MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 2GB.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small and medium sized laptops.

Performance
Equipped with DDR3, GeForce GT 940MX is only slightly faster than GeForce GT 940M.

System Suggestions
GeForce 940MX 2GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1366x768. We Recommend a Middle-Class Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Overview
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the First Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN).



Architecture
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Venus PRO which is a First Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Cape GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 250X.
Venus PRO has 10 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit is Clocked at 625MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 50W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M265X.
Performance is Comparable to the Desktop Radeon R7 250.

System Suggestions
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-