Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R7 240 Asus Low Profile OC 4GB Edition Radeon R7 240 2GB
Hitman 3 1020% 1053%
Cyberpunk 2077 761% 786%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 687% 711%
Resident Evil 8 761% 786%
FIFA 21 334% 347%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1111% 1147%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 662% 684%
Genshin Impact 761% 786%
Far Cry 6 1145% 1182%
The Medium 974% 1006%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 240 Asus Low Profile OC 4GB Edition are marginally better than the AMD Radeon R7 240 2GB.

The R7 240 has a 40 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the R7 240. This results in the R7 240 providing 0.8 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R7 240 has a 40 MHz higher core clock speed than the R7 240 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the R7 240 providing 0.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

Both the Radeon R7 240 Asus Low Profile OC 4GB Edition and the Radeon R7 240 2GB were released at the same time, so are likely to be quite similar.

The R7 240 has 2048 MB more video memory than the R7 240, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R7 240 also has superior memory performance overall.

The memory bandwidth of the Radeon R7 240 Asus Low Profile OC 4GB Edition and the Radeon R7 240 2GB are the same, which means the R7 240 and the R7 240 have equal limitations when it comes to graphical data transfer.

Both the Radeon R7 240 Asus Low Profile OC 4GB Edition and the Radeon R7 240 2GB have 320 Shader Processing Units. Having the same number of SPUs and using the same architecture means that the performance they offer can be compared by looking at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, the R7 240 has 0.8 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate and 0.4 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate, but the has GB/sec greater memory bandwidth. Although the GPUs are very similar in performance, the R7 240 takes the edge.

The Radeon R7 240 Asus Low Profile OC 4GB Edition requires 35 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 240 2GB requires 30 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 240 and a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 240. The R7 240 requires 5 Watts more than the R7 240 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the R7 240 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the R7 240.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed770 MHzvs730 MHz
Boost Clock820 MHzvs780 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Oland PROGCN 1.1 Oland PRO
OC Potential Fair vs Good
Driver Support Great vs Great
Release Date08 Oct 2013vs08 Oct 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

green tick vs
green tick vs
green tick vs
green tick vs green tick
green tick vs green tick

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed900 MHzvs900 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth28.8GB/secvs28.8GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units320vs320
Actual Shader Performance11%vs10%
Texture Mapping Units20vs20
Texture Rate15.4 GTexel/svs14.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs8
Pixel Rate6.2 GPixel/svs5.8 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections1vs1
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power35 Wattsvs30 Watts
Recommended PSU400 Watts & 27 Ampsvs400 Watts & 18 Amps

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHzvsIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1366x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R7 240 Asus Low Profile OC 4GB Edition is a Special Edition of AMD's Middle-Class Radeon R7 240, created by Asus.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit was increased from 730MHz to 770MHz whereas the Boost Clock is now of 820MHz, instead of 780MHz.

Overclock: Memory Clock

Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory. However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick.

Cooling Solution
Dust-Proof Fan: Unique fan design dissipates heat efficiently while extending a graphic cardís lifespan by 25%* through increased dust and particle resistance.

Benchmarks Indicate a 3% Performance Boost over the Reference Radeon R7 240.
Note: This Graphics Card has 2 variants: one with DDR3 and another with GDDR5. This is the DDR3 Version.

Radeon R7 240 2GB offers a core codenamed Oland PRO and thus features 320 Shader Processing Units, 20 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on a 128-bit bus width of standard DDR3. While the central unit runs at 730MHz and goes up to 780MHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 900MHz.
With a rated board TDP of 30W, it requires no extra power connectors.

Compared to Radeon R7 250, its performance is significantly lower (over 25% slower), especially at higher resolutions due to the limited memory bandwidth. Still, the TDP is relatively low and so this card may be used on low end systems and offer a reasonable upgrade, when compared to integrated graphics.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants