Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Tesla M2090 GeForce GTX 750 Zotac 1GB Edition
Cyberpunk 2077 206% 316%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 123% 203%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 206% 316%
Valorant 78% 70%
Grand Theft Auto VI 231% 350%
Death Stranding 135% 220%
Sword Art Online: Alicization Lycoris 215% 327%
F1 2020 154% 245%
Doom Eternal 127% 208%
Hyper Scape 108% 183%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Tesla M2090 are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Zotac 1GB Edition.

The GTX 750 has a 383 MHz higher core clock speed than the Tesla M2090, but the Tesla M2090 has 24 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 750. As a result, the Tesla M2090 exhibits a 3.3 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 750. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 750 has a 383 MHz higher core clock speed than the Tesla M2090, but the Tesla M2090 has 32 more Render Output Units than the GTX 750. As a result, the Tesla M2090 exhibits a 14.7 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 750. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 750 was released over a year more recently than the Tesla M2090, and so the GTX 750 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Tesla M2090.

The Tesla M2090 has 5120 MB more video memory than the GTX 750, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Tesla M2090 also has superior memory performance overall.

The Tesla M2090 has 97.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 750, which means that the memory performance of the Tesla M2090 is massively better than the GTX 750.

Both the Tesla M2090 and the GeForce GTX 750 Zotac 1GB Edition have 512 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the GTX 750 is 768 and by the Tesla M2090 is 768. Knowing that the shader performance of the GTX 750 is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

The GTX 750 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Tesla M2090. This means that the GTX 750 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Tesla M2090.

The Tesla M2090 requires 250 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 750 Zotac 1GB Edition requires 55 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the Tesla M2090 and a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 750. The Tesla M2090 requires 195 Watts more than the GTX 750 to run. The difference is significant enough that the Tesla M2090 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 750.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed650 MHzvs1033 MHz
Boost Clock-vs1111 MHz
ArchitectureFermi GF110Maxwell GM107-300-A2
OC Potential Fair vs Good
Driver Support Poor vs Great
Release Date25 Jul 2011vs18 Feb 2014
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

green tick vs -
green tick vs
green tick vs
green tick vs
3840x2160 - vs green tick

GPU Memory

Memory6144 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed925 MHzvs1250 MHz
Memory Bus384 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth177.6GB/secvs80GB/sec
L2 Cache 768 KB vs green tick 2048 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units512vs512
Actual Shader Performance32%vs37%
Texture Mapping Units56vs32
Texture Rate36.4 GTexel/svs33.1 GTexel/s
Render Output Units48vs16
Pixel Rate31.2 GPixel/svs16.5 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power250 Wattsvs55 Watts
Recommended PSU600 Watts & 42 Ampsvs300 Watts & 18 Amps

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-2600K 4-Core 3.40GHzvsIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Tesla M2090 is a Professional Graphics Card based on the First Revision of the Fermi Architecture.

Tesla M2090 Features a GPU Codenamed GF110 which is a Second Gen Fermi GPU and is Identical to the one used on the Gaming GeForce GTX 580. It offers DirectX Feature Level of 11.0 and has 16 Stream Multiprocessors activated offering a total of 512 Shader Processing Units, 56 TMUs and 48 ROPs.

The Central Unit runs at 650MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 384-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 925MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 6GB.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 250W, it requires at least a 600W PSU and one available 6-pin with one available 8-pin connectors.

Tesla M2090 has a Core Configuration Similar to GeForce GTX 580 but is heavily underclocked.
As a Result and also because of the lack of Drivers that are Gaming Certified, Tesla M2090's Performance is roughly on par with the weaker GeForce GTX 570.

System Suggestions
Tesla M2090 is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080. We recommend a High-End Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
GeForce GTX 750 Zotac 1GB Edition is a special edition of the fast-middle-class GeForce GTX 750.
This edition comes with a custom cooling cooling solution which by itself will allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 750 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology.
Furthermore, it comes overclocked out of the box in the central unit that was raised from 1020MHz to 1033MHz, while the Turbo Boost is now of 1111MHz, instead of 1085MHz. The operating memory clock was left untouched.
Further overclocking can be achieved easily, as the GPU has great OC potential.
Benchmarks indicate its performance is around 1% better than the reference NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and thus Radeon R7 260X is still faster.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants