Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Tesla M2090 GeForce GTX 780
Cyberpunk 2077 135% 30%
Hitman 3 206% 69%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 115% 19%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 108% 15%
FIFA 21 19% 34%
Grand Theft Auto VI 231% 83%
Far Cry 6 241% 88%
Genshin Impact 135% 30%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 238% 86%
Battlefield 6 206% 69%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 are significantly better than the Nvidia Tesla M2090.

The GeForce GTX 780 has a 213 MHz higher core clock speed and 136 more Texture Mapping Units than the Tesla M2090. This results in the GeForce GTX 780 providing 129.3 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce GTX 780 has a 213 MHz higher core clock speed than the Tesla M2090 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GeForce GTX 780 providing 10.2 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce GTX 780 was released over a year more recently than the Tesla M2090, and so the GeForce GTX 780 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Tesla M2090.

The Tesla M2090 has 3072 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 780, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the GeForce GTX 780 has superior memory performance.

The GeForce GTX 780 has 110.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Tesla M2090, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce GTX 780 is massively better than the Tesla M2090.

The Tesla M2090 has 512 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 780 has 2304. However, the actual shader performance of the Tesla M2090 is 666 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 780 is 2078. The GeForce GTX 780 having 1412 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce GTX 780 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Tesla M2090.

The GeForce GTX 780 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Tesla M2090. This means that the GeForce GTX 780 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Tesla M2090.

The Tesla M2090 requires 250 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 780 requires 250 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the Tesla M2090 and a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the GeForce GTX 780. The two GPUs require the same amount of wattage to run. As such, there is no need to worry about which will more significantly affect your yearly electricity bills.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed650 MHzvs863 MHz
Boost Clock-vs902 MHz
ArchitectureFermi GF110Kepler GK110-300-A1
OC Potential Fair vs Fair
Driver Support Poor vs Good
Release Date25 Jul 2011vs23 May 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1600x900
8.8
vs green tick
10
1920x1080
6.9
vs green tick
9.3
2560x1440
5.1
vs green tick
6.8
3840x2160 - vs green tick
5.2

GPU Memory

Memory6144 MBvs3072 MB
Memory Speed925 MHzvs1502 MHz
Memory Bus384 Bitvs384 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth177.6GB/secvs288.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 768 KB vs green tick 1536 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units512vs2304
Actual Shader Performance32%vs100%
Technology40nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs192
Texture Rate36.4 GTexel/svs165.7 GTexel/s
Render Output Units48vs48
Pixel Rate31.2 GPixel/svs41.4 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power250 Wattsvs250 Watts
Recommended PSU600 Watts & 42 Ampsvs600 Watts & 42 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-2600K 4-Core 3.40GHzvsIntel Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs2560x1440

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Tesla M2090 is a Professional Graphics Card based on the First Revision of the Fermi Architecture.

Architecture
Tesla M2090 Features a GPU Codenamed GF110 which is a Second Gen Fermi GPU and is Identical to the one used on the Gaming GeForce GTX 580. It offers DirectX Feature Level of 11.0 and has 16 Stream Multiprocessors activated offering a total of 512 Shader Processing Units, 56 TMUs and 48 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit runs at 650MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 384-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 925MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 6GB.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 250W, it requires at least a 600W PSU and one available 6-pin with one available 8-pin connectors.

Performance
Tesla M2090 has a Core Configuration Similar to GeForce GTX 580 but is heavily underclocked.
As a Result and also because of the lack of Drivers that are Gaming Certified, Tesla M2090's Performance is roughly on par with the weaker GeForce GTX 570.

System Suggestions
Tesla M2090 is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080. We recommend a High-End Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
GeForce GTX 780 is a high-end graphics-card based on the 28nm, Kepler architecture.
It's based on the Kepler GK110 Core (same used on Titan) but with 12 SMX activated and therefore offers 2304 Shader Processing Units, 192 TMUs and 48 ROPs on a 384-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. While the central unit runs at 863MHz and goes up to 902MHz in Turbo, the memory clock operates at 1502MHz. It consumes up to 250W.
Benchmarks indicate that its performance is up to 30% better than previous GeForce GTX 680 and thus allows even the most demanding games to be playable at the highest settings, at 1080p. With proper overclocking and cooling, it can surpass GeForce GTX Titan.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-