Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game HD i5 6400T Radeon R7 240 XFX Core Low Profile 4GB Edition
Cyberpunk 2077 779% 778%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 711% 711%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 803% 802%
Genshin Impact 787% 786%
eFootball PES 2021 347% 347%
Marvel's Avengers 740% 739%
Watch Dogs Legion 756% 755%
FIFA 21 347% 347%
Mafia: Definitive Edition 1172% 1171%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 685% 684%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 240 XFX Core Low Profile 4GB Edition are marginally better than the Intel HD i5 6400T.

The R7 240 has a 380 MHz higher core clock speed and 4 more Texture Mapping Units than the HD i5 6400T. This results in the R7 240 providing 9 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R7 240 has a 380 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD i5 6400T and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the R7 240 providing 3 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The HD i5 6400T was released over a year more recently than the R7 240, and so the HD i5 6400T is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the R7 240.

The R7 240 has 4096 MB video memory, but the HD i5 6400T does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The HD i5 6400T has 24 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R7 240 XFX Core Low Profile 4GB Edition has 320. However, the actual shader performance of the HD i5 6400T is 182 and the actual shader performance of the R7 240 is 212. The R7 240 having 30 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the HD i5 6400T performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The HD i5 6400T transistor size technology is 14 nm (nanometers) smaller than the R7 240. This means that the HD i5 6400T is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the R7 240. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the HD i5 6400T should consume less power than the R7 240.

The HD i5 6400T requires 35 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 240 XFX Core Low Profile 4GB Edition requires 35 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the HD i5 6400T and a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 240. The two GPUs require the same amount of wattage to run. As such, there is no need to worry about which will more significantly affect your yearly electricity bills.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed350 MHzvs730 MHz
Boost Clock950 MHzvs780 MHz
ArchitectureSkylake GT2-R0GCN 1.1 Oland PRO
OC Potential None vs Good
Driver Support Great vs Great
Release Date01 Sep 2015vs08 Oct 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
6.1
vs green tick
6.4
1600x900
4.6
vs green tick
4.9
1920x1080
3.1
green tick vs green tick
3.1
2560x1440
2.2
vs green tick
2.3
3840x2160
1.5
green tick vs green tick
1.5

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs4096 MB
Memory Speed1067 MHzvs667 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR4vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth34.1GB/secvs21.3GB/sec
L2 Cache 1024 KB green tick vs 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units24vs320
Actual Shader Performance9%vs10%
Technology14nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units16vs20
Texture Rate5.6 GTexel/svs14.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs8
Pixel Rate2.8 GPixel/svs5.8 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs0
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power35 Wattsvs35 Watts
Recommended PSU300 Watts & 20 Ampsvs400 Watts & 27 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.1vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-6400T 2.2GHzvsIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1366x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Intel HD i5 6400T is the specific version of Intel HD Graphics 530 Desktop that is integrated in the Core i5-6400T Processor.

Architecture
The Skylake Core includes support for DirectX 12.1, OpenCL 2.0 and OpenGL 4.4. Additionally, it also supports DDR4 Memory.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GT2-R0 which offers 24 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit Initially Runs at 350MHz and goes up to 950MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU Shares the System's RAM which varies from laptop to laptop. Typically, the GPU reserves 1.7GB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on the at which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. In this case, it is 1067MHz.
It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system.

Performance
Gaming benchmarks put its performance almost on level with a dedicated GeForce 920M.

System Suggestions
Intel HD i5 6400T is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1366x768. We recommend a Decent Processor and 4GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Overview
Radeon R7 240 XFX Core Low Profile 4GB Edition is a Special Edition of AMD's Middle-Class Radeon R7 240, created by XFX.

Overclock: Central Unit
None.

Overclock: Memory Clock
None.

Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory. However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick.


Cooling Solution
XFX Ghost Thermal 2.0 Technology: floating heatsink with open airflow between the PCB and the cover so that air can quickly ventilate off the card while simultaneously cooling the core process and the components. We've also made major advances from our first generation which includes a heat tested light weight plastic to create an overall lighter thermal which reduces the physical strain on your GPU.

Performance
Benchmarks Indicate no Performance Boost over the Reference Radeon R7 240.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-