Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GT 420 Gigabyte Rev. 3.0 2GB Edition Radeon HD 8350 (OEM)
Cyberpunk 2077 2279% 2913%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 2076% 2656%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 2005% 2567%
FIFA 21 1100% 1420%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2005% 2567%
Watch Dogs Legion 2195% 2807%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 3311% 4220%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 2153% 2753%
Grand Theft Auto VI 3247% 4140%
Genshin Impact 2279% 2913%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GT 420 Gigabyte Rev. 3.0 2GB Edition are noticeably better than the AMD Radeon HD 8350 (OEM).

The GT 420 has a 50 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 8350, but the HD 8350 has 4 more Texture Mapping Units than the GT 420. As a result, the HD 8350 exhibits a 2.4 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GT 420. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GT 420 has a 50 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 8350 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GT 420 providing 0.2 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The HD 8350 was released over a year more recently than the GT 420, and so the HD 8350 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GT 420.

The GT 420 has 1536 MB more video memory than the HD 8350, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GT 420 also has superior memory performance overall.

The GT 420 has 12.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the HD 8350, which means that the memory performance of the GT 420 is slightly better than the HD 8350.

The GeForce GT 420 Gigabyte Rev. 3.0 2GB Edition has 48 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 8350 (OEM) has 80. However, the actual shader performance of the GT 420 is 67 and the actual shader performance of the HD 8350 is 26. The GT 420 having 41 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GT 420 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the HD 8350.

The GeForce GT 420 Gigabyte Rev. 3.0 2GB Edition requires 50 Watts to run and the Radeon HD 8350 (OEM) requires 25 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 350 Watts for the GT 420 and a PSU with at least 250 Watts for the HD 8350. The GT 420 requires 25 Watts more than the HD 8350 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GT 420 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the HD 8350.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed700 MHzvs650 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureFermi GF108-200-A1Terascale Cedar PRO
OC Potential Fair vs Fair
Driver Support Poor vs Poor
Release Date03 Sep 2010vs08 Jan 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
3.2
green tick vs -
1600x900
2.4
green tick vs
2.1
1920x1080
1.8
green tick vs
1.5
2560x1440
1.3
green tick vs
1.1
3840x2160 - green tick vs green tick -

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs512 MB
Memory Speed800 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth25.6GB/secvs12.8GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB green tick vs 128 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units48vs80
Actual Shader Performance3%vs1%
Technology40nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units4vs8
Texture Rate2.8 GTexel/svs5.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs4
Pixel Rate2.8 GPixel/svs2.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections1vs0
DVI Connections1vs1
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power50 Wattsvs25 Watts
Recommended PSU350 Watts & 23 Ampsvs250 Watts & 17 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs11.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Celeron E3400 Dual-Core 2.6GHzvsIntel Celeron G1610 2.6GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs2 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1024x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GT 420 Gigabyte Rev. 3.0 2GB Edition is a special edition of NVIDIA's Middle-Class GeForce GT 420, created by Gigabyte.

Overclock: Central Unit
None.

Overclock: Memory Clock
The Operating Memory Clock was reduced from 900MHz to 800MHz.

Frame Buffer
Untouched.

Cooling Solution
GIGABYTE custom-designed 80 mm cooler, with air flow optimized cover and aluminum base. The cooler can dissipate heat effectively from the GPU while keeping the fan at lower speed and noise.

Performance
Benchmarks Indicate no Performance Boost over the Reference GeForce GT 420.
Overview
Radeon HD 8350 (OEM) is an OEM Only, entry-level Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Terascale Architecture.

Architecture
Terascale was AMD's first Unified Shader Architecture. In addition to being manufactured with a 40nm Technology, against the 55nm of previous Graphics Cards, it supports DirectX 10 and the Shaders now called Shader Processing Units have been redesigned and do all the Graphical work of Pixel and Vertex Shaders.

GPU
It equips a GPU codenamed Cedar PRO which has 1 Compute Units activated and thus offers 80 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs. The Central Unit Operates at 650MHz.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 512MB frame buffer of GDDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The memory clock operates at 800MHz. The size of the frame buffer is adequate.

Features
DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for Crossfire, Eyefinity, Stream Acceleration, PowerPlay and other technologies.

Cooling Solution
The Cooling Solution consists of a Single-Fan.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 18W, it requires at least a 250W PSU and it relies entirely on the PCI Slot for power, meaning no extra connectors are required.

Performance
Radeon HD 8350 (OEM) is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon HD 6350 and performs exactly like it.
Gaming benchmarks indicate its performance is extremely limited and even the older GeForce GT 220 is still faster.

System Suggestions
We recommend a modest processor (Intel Celeron) and 2GB of RAM for a system with Radeon HD 8350 (OEM).
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants
-
-