Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R9 380 PowerColor PCS+ 2GB Edition | GeForce GTX 560 Ti Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 62% | 171% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 48% | 148% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 43% | 140% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 128% | 281% |
FIFA 21 | 18% | 37% |
Genshin Impact | 62% | 171% |
Far Cry 6 | 135% | 292% |
Hitman 3 | 111% | 252% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 56% | 161% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 132% | 288% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 380 PowerColor PCS+ 2GB Edition are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition.
The R9 380 has a 80 MHz higher core clock speed and 48 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 560 Ti. This results in the R9 380 providing 52.2 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R9 380 has a 80 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 560 Ti and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the R9 380 providing 2.6 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R9 380 was released over three years more recently than the GTX 560 Ti, and so the R9 380 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 560 Ti when running the latest games.
The R9 380 has 1024 MB more video memory than the GTX 560 Ti, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 380 also has superior memory performance overall.
The R9 380 has 60.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 560 Ti, which means that the memory performance of the R9 380 is much better than the GTX 560 Ti.
The Radeon R9 380 PowerColor PCS+ 2GB Edition has 1792 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 560 Ti Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition has 384. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 380 is 1493 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 560 Ti is 691. The R9 380 having 802 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 380 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 560 Ti.
The R9 380 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 560 Ti. This means that the R9 380 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 560 Ti.
The Radeon R9 380 PowerColor PCS+ 2GB Edition requires 190 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce GTX 560 Ti Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the R9 380.
Core Speed | 980 MHz | ![]() | vs | 900 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | GCN 1.2 Antigua PRO | Fermi GF114-400-A1 | |||
OC Potential | Poor | vs |
![]() | Poor | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | Poor | |
Release Date | 18 Jun 2015 | ![]() | vs | 01 Jan 2011 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | 8.2
|
|
1920x1080 | 8.4
|
![]() |
vs | 6.4
|
|
2560x1440 | 6.2
|
![]() |
vs | 4.4
|
|
3840x2160 | 4.6
|
![]() |
vs | - |
Memory | 2048 MB | ![]() | vs | 1024 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1475 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1000 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 256 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 256 Bit |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 188.8GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 128GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 768 KB | ![]() |
vs | 512 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | yes | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 1792 | ![]() | vs | 384 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 72% | ![]() | vs | 33% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | 40nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 112 | ![]() | vs | 64 | |
Texture Rate | 109.8 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 57.6 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 32 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 32 |
Pixel Rate | 31.4 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 28.8 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | 2560x1600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 2 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2 |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Comparison |
Max Power | 190 Watts | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 500 Watts & 33 Amps | - |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4.5 |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-4690K 3.5GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Core i5-2300 2.8GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1920x1080 | ![]() | vs | 1600x900 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview Radeon R9 380 PowerColor PCS+ 2GB Edition is a Special Edition of AMD's Performance Radeon R9 380, created by PowerColor. Overclock: Central Unit The Central Unit is now of 980MHz, instead of 970MHz. Overclock: Memory Clock The Operating Memory Clock is now of 1475MHz, instead of 1375MHz. Frame Buffer Untouched. Cooling Solution PCS-Professional Cooling System: The unique cooling technology can decrease operating environment temp. Effectively, and enhance headroom for OC capabilities. Performance Benchmarks Indicate a 1% Performance Boost over the Reference Radeon R9 380. | GeForce GTX 560 Ti Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition is one of the many special editions of GeForce GTX 560 Ti. The new features include a new cooling system and an increase in the core-clock from 822MHz to 900MHz. Benchmarks indicate the performance is around 5% better than the standard edition. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - | - |