Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R7 250 1GB Crossfire GeForce GTX 650 Ti Power Edition OC 1GB
Cyberpunk 2077 183% 250%
Hitman 3 268% 356%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 158% 221%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 150% 210%
FIFA 21 43% 77%
Grand Theft Auto VI 298% 393%
Far Cry 6 309% 407%
Genshin Impact 183% 250%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 305% 402%
Battlefield 6 268% 356%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 250 1GB Crossfire are noticeably better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Power Edition OC 1GB.

The R7 250 has a 7 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 650 Ti, but the GTX 650 Ti has 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the R7 250. As a result, the GTX 650 Ti exhibits a 15.6 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R7 250. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R7 250 has a 7 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 650 Ti and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the R7 250 providing 0.1 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R7 250 was released over a year more recently than the GTX 650 Ti, and so the R7 250 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 650 Ti.

The R7 250 has 1024 MB more video memory than the GTX 650 Ti, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R7 250 also has superior memory performance overall.

The R7 250 has 60.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 650 Ti, which means that the memory performance of the R7 250 is much better than the GTX 650 Ti.

Both the Radeon R7 250 1GB Crossfire and the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Power Edition OC 1GB have 768 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the GTX 650 Ti is 763 and by the R7 250 is 763. Knowing that the shader performance of the GTX 650 Ti is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

The Radeon R7 250 1GB Crossfire requires 130 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Power Edition OC 1GB. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the R7 250.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1000 MHzvs993 MHz
Boost Clock1050 MHzvs-
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Oland XT (x2)Kepler GK106-220-A1
OC Potential Poor vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date08 Oct 2013vs01 Oct 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
8.1
green tick vs
7.2
1920x1080
6.3
green tick vs
5.6
2560x1440
4.6
green tick vs
3.9
3840x2160
2.9
green tick vs
2.5

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed1150 MHzvs1350 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth147.2GB/secvs86.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 1024 KB green tick vs 256 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units768vs768
Actual Shader Performance33%vs37%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units48vs64
Texture Rate48 GTexel/svs63.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs16
Pixel Rate16 GPixel/svs15.9 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs4096x2160
VGA Connections1vs0
DVI Connections1vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power130 Watts-
Recommended PSU500 Watts & 33 Amps-

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4430 3.0GHzvsIntel Core i5-3450 3.1GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R7 250 1GB Crossfire is a solution of two Radeon R7 250 1GB put together using AMD's Crossfire Technology.

Architecture
It consists of 2 GPUs Codenamed GCN 1.1 Oland XT which, together, offer 768 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

GPU
The central unit runs at 1000MHz and goes up to 1050MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
Each GPU accesses a 1GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is adequate. The Memory Clock Operates at 1125MHz.

Power Consumption
Power Consumption lies between 125W and 135W.

Performance
Radeon R7 250 1GB Crossfire Offers slightly more Performance than the Higher Positioned Radeon R7 260 but comes at a higher cost and relies highly in proper Driver Support..

System Suggestions
Radeon R7 250 1GB Crossfire is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080. We recommend a Performance Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Power Edition OC 1GB is a special edition of the fast-middle-class GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
This edition features a new and better cooling system called Cyclone II Thermal Design with Dust Removal technology and an increase in the central clock that went from 928MHz to 993MHz. The Memory clock was left untouched.
The overclocking is relevant and benchmarks indicate there's a 4% boost when compared to the reference GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-