Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R7 250 1GB Crossfire GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition
Cyberpunk 2077 183% 205%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 158% 179%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 150% 170%
Hitman 3 268% 296%
Grand Theft Auto VI 298% 329%
FIFA 21 43% 54%
Far Cry 6 309% 341%
Genshin Impact 183% 205%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 305% 337%
Watch Dogs Legion 173% 194%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 250 1GB Crossfire are very slightly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition.

The GTX 750 has a 215 MHz higher core clock speed than the R7 250, but the R7 250 has 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 750. As a result, the R7 250 exhibits a 9.1 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 750. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 750 has a 215 MHz higher core clock speed than the R7 250 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 750 providing 3.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 750 was released less than a year after the R7 250, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The R7 250 has 1024 MB more video memory than the GTX 750, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R7 250 also has superior memory performance overall.

The R7 250 has 67 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 750, which means that the memory performance of the R7 250 is much better than the GTX 750.

The Radeon R7 250 1GB Crossfire has 768 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition has 512. However, the actual shader performance of the R7 250 is 685 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 is 894. The GTX 750 having 209 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the R7 250 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The Radeon R7 250 1GB Crossfire requires 130 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition requires 55 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the R7 250 and a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 750. The R7 250 requires 75 Watts more than the GTX 750 to run. The difference is significant enough that the R7 250 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 750.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1000 MHzvs1215 MHz
Boost Clock1050 MHzvs1294 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Oland XT (x2)Maxwell GM107-300-A2
OC Potential Poor vs Good
Driver Support Great vs Great
Release Date08 Oct 2013vs02 Mar 2014
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
8.1
green tick vs
7.9
1920x1080
6.3
green tick vs
6.1
2560x1440
4.6
green tick vs
4.3
3840x2160
2.9
green tick vs
2.6

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed1150 MHzvs1253 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth147.2GB/secvs80.2GB/sec
L2 Cache 1024 KB vs green tick 2048 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units768vs512
Actual Shader Performance33%vs43%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units48vs32
Texture Rate48 GTexel/svs38.9 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs16
Pixel Rate16 GPixel/svs19.4 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs4096x2160
VGA Connections1vs0
DVI Connections1vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power130 Wattsvs55 Watts
Recommended PSU500 Watts & 33 Ampsvs300 Watts & 20 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4430 3.0GHzvsIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R7 250 1GB Crossfire is a solution of two Radeon R7 250 1GB put together using AMD's Crossfire Technology.

Architecture
It consists of 2 GPUs Codenamed GCN 1.1 Oland XT which, together, offer 768 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

GPU
The central unit runs at 1000MHz and goes up to 1050MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
Each GPU accesses a 1GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is adequate. The Memory Clock Operates at 1125MHz.

Power Consumption
Power Consumption lies between 125W and 135W.

Performance
Radeon R7 250 1GB Crossfire Offers slightly more Performance than the Higher Positioned Radeon R7 260 but comes at a higher cost and relies highly in proper Driver Support..

System Suggestions
Radeon R7 250 1GB Crossfire is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080. We recommend a Performance Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
GeForce GTX 750 EVGA Superclocked 1GB Edition is a special edition of the fast-middle-class GeForce GTX 750.
This edition comes with a custom cooling cooling solution which by itself will allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 750 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology.
Furthermore, it comes overclocked out of the box in the central unit that was raised from 1020MHz to 1215MHz, while the Turbo Boost is now of 1294MHz, instead of 1085MHz. The operating memory clock was left untouched.
Further overclocking can be achieved easily, as the GPU has great OC potential.
Benchmarks indicate its performance is around 6% better than the reference card.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-
-